• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Don't fear the social relations model: reply to Piper, Ogrodniczuk, Lamarche, and Joyce.

作者信息

Marcus David K

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.

出版信息

Int J Group Psychother. 2006 Apr;56(2):211-9. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2006.56.2.211.

DOI:10.1521/ijgp.2006.56.2.211
PMID:16643127
Abstract

By studying actual therapy groups and using a sophisticated design to determine that clients who are held in higher esteem by their fellow group members show greater improvement over the course of therapy, Piper, Ogrodniczuk, Lamarche, and Joyce (this issue) have made a significant contribution to the group psychotherapy literature. Unfortunately, Piper et al. focused much of their discussion on the difficulties they faced using the social relations model (SRM) and the statistical program SOREMO. Although the SRM is not simple and it takes practice to run SOREMO, the analytic alternative proposed by Piper et al. has a number of serious limitations that prevents it from being a viable alternative. There is much to be gained from learning the SRM; for those group therapists and researchers who do not want to learn the SRM, they can always consult or collaborate with SRM researchers.

摘要

相似文献

1
Don't fear the social relations model: reply to Piper, Ogrodniczuk, Lamarche, and Joyce.
Int J Group Psychother. 2006 Apr;56(2):211-9. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2006.56.2.211.
2
Use of the social relations model by group therapists: application and commentary.
Int J Group Psychother. 2006 Apr;56(2):191-209. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2006.56.2.191.
3
Interpersonal predictors of outcome following short-term group therapy for complicated grief: a replication.短期团体治疗复杂悲伤后结局的人际预测因素:一项复制研究。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):122-35. doi: 10.1002/cpp.686.
4
Interpersonal feedback: a social relations perspective.人际反馈:一种社会关系视角。
Int J Group Psychother. 2006 Apr;56(2):173-89. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2006.56.2.173.
5
Cohesion, alliance, and outcome in group psychotherapy: comments on Joyce, Piper, & Ogrodniczuk (2007).
Int J Group Psychother. 2007 Oct;57(4):533-40. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2007.57.4.533.
6
Therapeutic alliance and cohesion variables as predictors of outcome in short-term group psychotherapy.治疗联盟与凝聚力变量作为短期团体心理治疗结果的预测因素
Int J Group Psychother. 2007 Jul;57(3):269-96. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2007.57.3.269.
7
A process-oriented group model for university students: a semi-structured approach.一种面向大学生的过程导向型小组模式:一种半结构化方法。
Int J Group Psychother. 2009 Oct;59(4):511-28. doi: 10.1521/ijgp.2009.59.4.511.
8
Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.两种登顶的途径:有证据表明,支配地位和威望是通往社会地位和影响力的两条截然不同但可行的途径。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jan;104(1):103-25. doi: 10.1037/a0030398. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
The effectiveness of psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy (PIT) in routine clinical practice: a benchmarking comparison.心理动力人际治疗(PIT)在常规临床实践中的有效性:一项基准比较。
Psychol Psychother. 2008 Jun;81(Pt 2):157-75. doi: 10.1348/147608307X270889. Epub 2008 Jan 4.
10
[Man in a group. Group relations in psychiatry].[群体中的人。精神病学中的群体关系]
Schweiz Arch Neurol Neurochir Psychiatr. 1972;110(1):131-42.