Kirjonen J, Telama R, Luukkonen R, Kääriä S, Kaila-Kangas L, Leino-Arjas P
LIKES-Research Center for Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006 Jun;16(3):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00476.x.
The aim of the study was to examine the stability of voluntary and household physical activity (PA) and to compare it with that of the use of the most common stimulants. The prospective cohort study comprised of follow-ups at 5, 10, and 28 years at baseline in 1973 in four plants of an industrial corporation in Finland. A systematic, non-proportional sample (n=902, age range 18-64 years) stratified for age, gender, and occupational status was drawn from the employees. Scores of PA were based on a questionnaire and interviews. Logistic regression models with proportional odds assumptions were counted. The 5-year stability (Spearman's rho) of PA time was 0.44 (PA intensity 0.44), the respective 10-year coefficient was 0.26 (0.32), and that in the 28-year follow-up was 0.18 (0.20). The stability of PA decreased rapidly from 1973 to 1983 and more slowly thereafter. Changes along the follow-up reflect a polarization of the distributions of PA within the sample. Age and an initially low level of activity were the strongest predictors of inactivity. The stability coefficient of smoking and alcohol consumption was twice as high as that of PA. Stimulant use was a greater factor in the individual's lifestyle than PA.
该研究的目的是检验自愿性和家庭体力活动(PA)的稳定性,并将其与最常见兴奋剂使用情况的稳定性进行比较。这项前瞻性队列研究包括在1973年对芬兰一家工业公司的四家工厂进行基线调查后的5年、10年和28年随访。从员工中抽取了一个按年龄、性别和职业状况分层的系统非比例样本(n = 902,年龄范围18 - 64岁)。PA得分基于问卷调查和访谈。采用了具有比例优势假设的逻辑回归模型。PA时间的5年稳定性(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数)为0.44(PA强度为0.44),10年系数分别为0.26(0.32),28年随访时为0.18(0.20)。PA的稳定性从1973年到1983年迅速下降,此后下降较慢。随访期间的变化反映了样本中PA分布的两极分化。年龄和最初较低的活动水平是不活动的最强预测因素。吸烟和饮酒的稳定性系数是PA的两倍。兴奋剂的使用在个人生活方式中比PA是一个更大的因素。