Marquardt O, Adam K H, Straub O C
Federal Research Centre for Virus Diseases of Animals, Tübingen, F.R.G.
J Virol Methods. 1991 Aug;33(3):267-82. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(91)90026-v.
The RNase mismatch cleavage method was examined for its efficiency of indicating single-base sequence differences in the capsid protein-coding regions of different foot-and-mouth disease virus subtype O1 strains. The method was found suitable for indicating such differences. RNase A as well as RNase T1 contributed to substrate conversion. Examples for the cleavage of eleven different single-base mismatches in RNA double-strands are now known. All virus genomes found to differ from each other exhibited three or more non-neighboured single-base sequence differences. Other genomes found to be indistinguishable by this method were those of a recent field isolate adapted to cell culture, and those of a vaccine production strain; its progeny was transmitted to pig and cow and then analyzed. The results suggest that host change does not necessarily select for antigenic variant virus, and that virus submitted to some kind of selection pressure is changed at more than one position.
研究了核糖核酸酶错配切割法在指示不同口蹄疫病毒O1亚型毒株衣壳蛋白编码区单碱基序列差异方面的效率。发现该方法适用于指示此类差异。核糖核酸酶A以及核糖核酸酶T1都有助于底物转化。现在已知RNA双链中11种不同单碱基错配的切割实例。发现彼此不同的所有病毒基因组都表现出三个或更多不相邻的单碱基序列差异。通过该方法发现无法区分的其他基因组是适应细胞培养的近期田间分离株和疫苗生产株的基因组;其后代传播给猪和牛,然后进行分析。结果表明,宿主变化不一定会选择抗原变异病毒,并且受到某种选择压力的病毒会在多个位置发生变化。