Beckert Stefan, Witte Maria, Wicke Corinna, Königsrainer Alfred, Coerper Stephan
Department of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Diabetes Care. 2006 May;29(5):988-92. doi: 10.2337/diacare.295988.
Several well-accepted classification systems are available for diabetic foot ulcers. However, there are only a few and scientifically not validated severity scores. The aim of this study was to establish a new wound-based clinical scoring system for diabetic foot ulcers suitable for daily clinical practice anticipating chances for healing and risk of amputation.
Four clinically defined parameters, namely palpable pedal pulses, probing to bone, ulcer location, and presence of multiple ulcerations, were prospectively assessed in 1,000 consecutive patients. In the next step, a new diabetic ulcer severity score (DUSS) was created from these parameters. Palpable pedal pulses were categorized by the absence (scored as 1) or presence (scored as 0) of pedal pulses, while probing to bone was defined as yes (scored as 1) or no (scored as 0). The site of ulceration was defined as toe (scored as 0) or foot (scored as 1) ulcer. Patients with multiple ulcerations were graded as 1 compared with those with single ulcers (scored as 0). The DUSS was calculated by adding these separate gradings to a theoretical maximum of 4. Wounds were followed-up for 365 days or until healing or amputation if earlier. Probability of healing and risk of amputation were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Uni- and multivariate analyses showed a significantly higher probability of healing for patients with palpable pulses, no probing to bone, toe ulcers, and absence of multiple ulcerations. When patients were divided into subgroups with the same DUSS, we found significantly different probabilities for healing. We showed a decreasing probability of healing for ulcers with a high DUSS, concurrent with increasing amputation rates. An increase in the DUSS by one score point reduced the chance for healing by 35%. Similarly, the higher the ulcer score, the larger the initial wound area, the longer the wound history, and the more likely the need for surgery or hospitalization.
The DUSS categorizes different ulcers into subgroups with specific severity and similar clinical outcome. Using this score, the probabilities for healing, amputation, need for surgery, and hospitalization are predictable with high accuracy. This might be useful for the anticipation of health care costs and for comparison of subgroups of patients in clinical studies.
目前有几种广泛认可的糖尿病足溃疡分类系统。然而,仅有少数尚未经过科学验证的严重程度评分。本研究的目的是建立一种新的基于伤口的糖尿病足溃疡临床评分系统,适用于日常临床实践,以预测愈合机会和截肢风险。
对1000例连续患者前瞻性评估了四个临床定义参数,即可触及的足部脉搏、探及骨质、溃疡位置和多发溃疡情况。下一步,根据这些参数创建了一个新的糖尿病溃疡严重程度评分(DUSS)。可触及的足部脉搏根据有无脉搏进行分类(无脉搏计1分,有脉搏计0分),而探及骨质定义为是(计1分)或否(计0分)。溃疡部位定义为趾部溃疡(计0分)或足部溃疡(计1分)。与单发溃疡患者(计0分)相比,多发溃疡患者计1分。DUSS通过将这些单独的分级相加得出,理论最大值为4分。对伤口进行365天随访,或在愈合或截肢(以先发生者为准)前持续随访。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算愈合概率和截肢风险。
单因素和多因素分析显示,有可触及脉搏、未探及骨质、趾部溃疡且无多发溃疡的患者愈合概率显著更高。当将患者分为具有相同DUSS的亚组时,我们发现愈合概率存在显著差异。我们发现DUSS高的溃疡愈合概率降低,同时截肢率增加。DUSS每增加1分,愈合机会降低35%。同样,溃疡评分越高,初始伤口面积越大,伤口病史越长,手术或住院需求的可能性就越大。
DUSS将不同溃疡分为具有特定严重程度和相似临床结局的亚组。使用该评分,愈合、截肢、手术需求和住院的概率可高精度预测。这可能有助于预测医疗保健成本以及在临床研究中比较患者亚组。