Suppr超能文献

轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病的简短 informant 筛查测试

Brief informant screening test for mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Li Minglei, Ng Tze Pin, Kua Ee Heok, Ko Soo Meng

机构信息

Gerontological Research Programme, Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2006;21(5-6):392-402. doi: 10.1159/000092808. Epub 2006 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent research has attempted combinations of instruments to improve screening accuracy for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and early Alzheimer's disease (AD). We compared Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Immediate and Delayed Recall (Logical Memory I and II; LM-I and LM-II, respectively), a single-item informant report of memory problem (IRMP), and a four-item Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (4IADL) scale, and combinations of these tests.

METHOD

The tests were administered together with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) to subjects who were cognitively intact (CDR = 0, n = 88), and with diagnoses of MCI (CDR = 0.5, n = 37) and early AD (CDR = 1-2, n = 19).

RESULTS

Screening accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area under curve, AUC) for identifying MCI or MCI-AD was lowest for MMSE (AUC 67.6% for MCI or 77.9% for MCI-AD), and better for IRMP (79.5 or 83.2%), 4IADL (76.9 or 84.7%), LM-I (81.2 or 87.1%) and LM-II (86.1 or 90.8%). Combining IRMP, 4IADL and LM-II was most accurate (AUC 91.7% for MCI or 94.5% for MCI-AD); sensitivity: 86.5 or 89.3%; specificity: 86.4 or 88.6%. However, combining IRMP and 4IADL gave nearly as good accuracy (AUC 87.2 or 91.6%); sensitivity: 86.5 or 85.7%; specificity: 79.5 or 85.2%.

CONCLUSION

A brief instrument combining an IRMP and 4IADL items is potentially useful in screening for MCI and early AD.

摘要

背景/目的:最近的研究尝试联合使用多种工具,以提高对轻度认知障碍(MCI)和早期阿尔茨海默病(AD)的筛查准确性。我们比较了简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、即时与延迟回忆(分别为逻辑记忆I和II;LM-I和LM-II)、关于记忆问题的单项 informant 报告(IRMP)以及四项日常工具性活动(4IADL)量表,以及这些测试的组合。

方法

将这些测试与临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)一起施用于认知功能正常的受试者(CDR = 0,n = 88),以及被诊断为MCI(CDR = 0.5,n = 37)和早期AD(CDR = 1 - 2,n = 19)的受试者。

结果

用于识别MCI或MCI-AD的筛查准确性(曲线下面积,AUC),MMSE最低(MCI时AUC为67.6%,MCI-AD时为77.9%),而IRMP(79.5%或83.2%)、4IADL(76.9%或84.7%)、LM-I(81.2%或87.1%)和LM-II(86.1%或90.8%)的准确性更高。联合使用IRMP、4IADL和LM-II最为准确(MCI时AUC为91.7%,MCI-AD时为94.5%);敏感性:86.5%或89.3%;特异性:86.4%或88.6%。然而,联合使用IRMP和4IADL的准确性几乎与之相当(AUC为87.2%或91.6%);敏感性:86.5%或85.7%;特异性:79.5%或85.2%。

结论

一种结合IRMP和4IADL项目的简短工具在筛查MCI和早期AD方面可能有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验