Burr M D, Clark S J, Spear C R, Camper A K
Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717-3980, USA.
Microb Ecol. 2006 May;51(4):479-86. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9050-z. Epub 2006 Apr 28.
Two different strategies for molecular analysis of bacterial diversity, 16S rDNA cloning and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), were combined into a single protocol that took advantage of the best attributes of each: the ability of cloning to package DNA sequence information and the ability of DGGE to display a community profile. In this combined protocol, polymerase chain reaction products from environmental DNA were cloned, and then DGGE was used to screen the clone libraries. Both individual clones and pools of randomly selected clones were analyzed by DGGE, and these migration patterns were compared to the conventional DGGE profile produced directly from environmental DNA. For two simple bacterial communities (biofilm from a humics-fed laboratory reactor and planktonic bacteria filtered from an urban freshwater pond), pools of 35-50 clones produced DGGE profiles that contained most of the bands visible in the conventional DGGE profiles, indicating that the clone pools were adequate for identifying the dominant genotypes. However, DGGE profiles of two different pools of 50 clones from a lawn soil clone library were distinctly different from each other and from the conventional DGGE profile, indicating that this small number of clones poorly represented the bacterial diversity in soil. Individual clones with the same apparent DGGE mobility as prominent bands in the humics reactor community profiles were sequenced from the clone plasmid DNA rather than from bands excised from the gel. Because a longer fragment was cloned (approximately 1500 bp) than was actually analyzed in DGGE (approximately 350 bp), far more sequence information was available using this approach that could have been recovered from an excised gel band. This clone/DGGE protocol permitted rapid analysis of the microbial diversity in the two moderately complex systems, but was limited in its ability to represent the diversity in the soil microbial community. Nonetheless, clone/DGGE is a promising strategy for fractionating diverse microbial communities into manageable subsets consisting of small pools of clones.
细菌多样性分子分析的两种不同策略,即16S rDNA克隆和变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE),被整合到一个单一方案中,该方案利用了每种策略的最佳特性:克隆包装DNA序列信息的能力以及DGGE展示群落图谱的能力。在这个组合方案中,对环境DNA的聚合酶链反应产物进行克隆,然后用DGGE筛选克隆文库。通过DGGE对单个克隆和随机选择的克隆池进行分析,并将这些迁移模式与直接从环境DNA产生的传统DGGE图谱进行比较。对于两个简单的细菌群落(腐殖质喂养的实验室反应器中的生物膜和从城市淡水池塘过滤的浮游细菌),35 - 50个克隆的克隆池产生的DGGE图谱包含了传统DGGE图谱中可见的大部分条带,这表明克隆池足以识别优势基因型。然而,草坪土壤克隆文库中两个不同的50个克隆池的DGGE图谱彼此明显不同,也与传统DGGE图谱不同,这表明这少量的克隆不能很好地代表土壤中的细菌多样性。从克隆质粒DNA而非从凝胶中切下的条带对与腐殖质反应器群落图谱中突出条带具有相同明显DGGE迁移率的单个克隆进行测序。由于克隆的片段(约1500 bp)比DGGE实际分析的片段(约350 bp)长,使用这种方法可获得的序列信息比从切下的凝胶条带中回收的信息多得多。这种克隆/DGGE方案允许对两个中等复杂系统中的微生物多样性进行快速分析,但其代表土壤微生物群落多样性的能力有限。尽管如此,克隆/DGGE是一种很有前景的策略,可将多样的微生物群落分成由少量克隆池组成的可管理子集。