Suppr超能文献

通过PCR-变性梯度凝胶电泳对用于微生物群落指纹图谱分析的rrs基因不同高变区进行比较。

Comparisons of different hypervariable regions of rrs genes for use in fingerprinting of microbial communities by PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.

作者信息

Yu Zhongtang, Morrison Mark

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, 2027 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Aug;70(8):4800-6. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4800-4806.2004.

Abstract

Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) has become a widely used tool to examine microbial diversity and community structure, but no systematic comparison has been made of the DGGE profiles obtained when different hypervariable (V) regions are amplified from the same community DNA samples. We report here a study to make such comparisons and establish a preferred choice of V region(s) to examine by DGGE, when community DNA extracted from samples of digesta is used. When the members of the phylogenetically representative set of 218 rrs genes archived in the RDP II database were compared, the V1 region was found to be the most variable, followed by the V9 and V3 regions. The temperature of the lowest-melting-temperature (T(m(L))) domain for each V region was also calculated for these rrs genes, and the V1 to V4 region was found to be most heterogeneous with respect to T(m(L)). The average T(m(L)) values and their standard deviations for each V region were then used to devise the denaturing gradients suitable for separating 95% of all the sequences, and the PCR-DGGE profiles produced from the same community DNA samples with these conditions were compared. The resulting DGGE profiles were substantially different in terms of the number, resolution, and relative intensity of the amplification products. The DGGE profiles of the V3 region were best, and the V3 to V5 and V6 to V8 regions produced better DGGE profiles than did other multiple V-region amplicons. Introduction of degenerate bases in the primers used to amplify the V1 or V3 region alone did not improve DGGE banding profiles. Our results show that DGGE analysis of gastrointestinal microbiomes is best accomplished by the amplification of either the V3 or V1 region of rrs genes, but if a longer amplification product is desired, then the V3 to V5 or V6 to V8 region should be targeted.

摘要

变性梯度凝胶电泳(DGGE)已成为检测微生物多样性和群落结构的广泛应用工具,但尚未对从相同群落DNA样本中扩增不同高变区(V区)时获得的DGGE图谱进行系统比较。我们在此报告一项研究,旨在进行此类比较,并确定在使用从消化物样本中提取的群落DNA时,通过DGGE检测的V区的首选。当比较RDP II数据库中存档的218个rrs基因的系统发育代表性集合的成员时,发现V1区变化最大,其次是V9和V3区。还针对这些rrs基因计算了每个V区的最低解链温度(T(m(L)))结构域的温度,发现V1至V4区在T(m(L))方面最不均匀。然后使用每个V区的平均T(m(L))值及其标准偏差来设计适合分离所有序列95%的变性梯度,并比较在这些条件下从相同群落DNA样本产生的PCR-DGGE图谱。所得的DGGE图谱在扩增产物的数量、分辨率和相对强度方面有很大差异。V3区的DGGE图谱最佳,V3至V5区和V6至V8区产生的DGGE图谱比其他多个V区扩增产物更好。单独用于扩增V1或V3区的引物中引入简并碱基并不能改善DGGE条带图谱。我们的结果表明,胃肠道微生物群落的DGGE分析最好通过扩增rrs基因的V3或V1区来完成,但如果需要更长的扩增产物,则应靶向V3至V5区或V6至V8区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验