Green R E A, Christensen B, Melo B, Monette G, Bayley M, Hebert D, Inness E, Mcilroy W
Brain Cogn. 2006 Mar;60(2):199-201.
The status of neurorehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI) is under active debate because of a dearth of research findings demonstrating effectiveness. This may be due, in part, to limitations in our understanding of basic mechanisms of cognitive and motor recovery,including those that might impede recovery. In this regard, we examined whether overall recovery following TBI might be undermined by competition between cognitive and motor functions for finite neural resources during recovery. In this preliminary study, 21 moderately and severely impaired patients were administered cognitive and motor assessments at 1, 4, and 12 months post-TBI, and recovery of cognitive and motor functions was measured using regression residuals. Negative correlations between recovery of cognitive versus motor functions were used as the index of competition. We found suggestive evidence that there may indeed be a trade-off between the recovery of cognitive and motor functions after TBI. Implications for rehabilitation are discussed.
由于缺乏能证明有效性的研究结果,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的神经康复现状正处于激烈的争论中。这可能部分归因于我们对认知和运动恢复的基本机制理解有限,包括那些可能阻碍恢复的机制。在这方面,我们研究了TBI后的整体恢复是否会因恢复过程中认知和运动功能对有限神经资源的竞争而受到影响。在这项初步研究中,21名中度和重度受损患者在TBI后的1个月、4个月和12个月接受了认知和运动评估,并使用回归残差来测量认知和运动功能的恢复情况。认知功能恢复与运动功能恢复之间的负相关被用作竞争指标。我们发现有暗示性的证据表明,TBI后认知和运动功能的恢复之间可能确实存在权衡。文中还讨论了对康复的启示。