Auger Floriane, Gendron Marie-Claude, Chamot Christophe, Marano Francelyne, Dazy Anne-Catherine
Laboratoire de Cytophysiologie et Toxicologie Cellulaire, Université Paris 7, 75251 Paris cedex 05, France.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006 Sep 15;215(3):285-94. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.03.002. Epub 2006 May 2.
Numerous epidemiological studies support the contention that ambient air pollution particles can adversely affect human health. To explain the acute inflammatory process in airways exposed to particles, a number of in vitro studies have been performed on cells grown submerged on plastic and poorly differentiated, and on cell lines, the physiology of which is somewhat different from that of well-differentiated cells. In order to obtain results using a model system in which epithelial cells are similar to those of the human airway in vivo, apical membranes of well-differentiated human nasal epithelial (HNE) cells cultured in an air-liquid interface (ALI) were exposed for 24 h to diesel exhaust particles (DEP) and Paris urban air particles (PM(2.5)). DEP and PM(2.5) (10-80 microg/cm(2)) stimulated both IL-8 and amphiregulin (ligand of EGFR) secretion exclusively towards the basal compartment. In contrast, there was no IL-1beta secretion and only weak non-reproducible secretion of TNF-alpha. IL-6 and GM-CSF were consistently stimulated towards the apical compartment and only when cells were exposed to PM(2.5). ICAM-1 protein expression on cell surfaces remained low after particle exposure, although it increased after TNF-alpha treatment. Internalization of particles, which is believed to initiate oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokine expression, was restricted to small nanoparticles (< or =40 nm). Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was detected, and DEP were more efficient than PM(2.5). Collectively, our results suggest that airway epithelial cells exposed to particles augment the local inflammatory response in the lung but cannot alone initiate a systemic inflammatory response.
大量流行病学研究支持这样的观点,即环境空气污染颗粒会对人类健康产生不利影响。为了解释暴露于颗粒的气道中的急性炎症过程,已经对在塑料上贴壁生长且分化程度低的细胞以及细胞系进行了多项体外研究,这些细胞系的生理学与分化良好的细胞有所不同。为了使用一种上皮细胞与体内人气道上皮细胞相似的模型系统来获得结果,将在气液界面(ALI)中培养的分化良好的人鼻上皮(HNE)细胞的顶端膜暴露于柴油废气颗粒(DEP)和巴黎城市空气颗粒(PM(2.5))24小时。DEP和PM(2.5)(10 - 80微克/平方厘米)仅刺激IL-8和双调蛋白(表皮生长因子受体的配体)向基底腔室分泌。相比之下,没有IL-1β分泌,TNF-α分泌微弱且不可重复。IL-6和粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)仅在细胞暴露于PM(2.5)时持续向顶端腔室刺激分泌。颗粒暴露后细胞表面的细胞间黏附分子-1(ICAM-1)蛋白表达仍然很低,尽管在TNF-α处理后有所增加。颗粒的内化被认为会引发氧化应激和促炎细胞因子表达,其仅限于小纳米颗粒(≤40纳米)。检测到活性氧(ROS)的产生,并且DEP比PM(2.5)更有效。总体而言,我们的结果表明,暴露于颗粒的气道上皮细胞会增强肺部的局部炎症反应,但不能单独引发全身炎症反应。