Stare Aljaz, Hvala Nadja, Vrecko Darko
Department of Systems and Control, Jozef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
ISA Trans. 2006 Apr;45(2):159-74. doi: 10.1016/s0019-0578(07)60187-6.
The aim of this work is to develop the ammonia models that could be used for model predictive control (MPC) of nitrification process in a wastewater treatment plant. First, a reduced nonlinear model is presented, which is based on expression for nitrification reaction rate in activated sludge model No. 1 and modified for attached biomass processes, while second, a linear black-box model is shown. The data used for model identification were collected during several weeks of experiments on a real plant so that good identification data were obtained. The designed models were validated based on open loop simulations and predictions. Validation results show that the reduced nonlinear model performs better compared to the linear model, however, both models show relatively large errors compared to the real plant data. Hence, a closed loop simulation study was performed to see the differences between the performance of model predictive controller using previously estimated linear and nonlinear models and a standard proportional integral (PI) controller. From the simulation study results it was seen that in spite of relatively large model errors the MPC algorithms give better results in terms of ammonia removal compared to the PI controller, while MPC with the nonlinear model shows additional improvements over the MPC with the linear model.
这项工作的目的是开发可用于污水处理厂硝化过程模型预测控制(MPC)的氨模型。首先,提出了一个简化的非线性模型,该模型基于活性污泥1号模型中的硝化反应速率表达式,并针对附着生物量过程进行了修正;其次,展示了一个线性黑箱模型。用于模型识别的数据是在实际工厂进行的数周实验期间收集的,从而获得了良好的识别数据。所设计的模型基于开环仿真和预测进行了验证。验证结果表明,简化的非线性模型比线性模型表现更好,然而,与实际工厂数据相比,这两个模型都显示出相对较大的误差。因此,进行了闭环仿真研究,以查看使用先前估计的线性和非线性模型的模型预测控制器与标准比例积分(PI)控制器在性能上的差异。从仿真研究结果可以看出,尽管模型误差相对较大,但与PI控制器相比,MPC算法在氨去除方面给出了更好的结果,而使用非线性模型的MPC比使用线性模型的MPC显示出进一步的改进。