Suppr超能文献

连续输注笑气和纳布啡用于射频消融治疗心房扑动患者镇静的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial of continuous flow nitrous oxide and nalbuphine infusion for sedation of patients during radiofrequency atrial flutter ablation.

作者信息

Laurent Gabriel, Bertaux Géraldine, Martel Alexandra, Fraison Michel, Fromentin Stéphane, Gonzalez Stéphanie, Pierre François Saint, Wolf Jean Eric

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Dijon, France.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Apr;29(4):351-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00352.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients with common atrial flutter (CAF), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) causes discomfort. Patients undergoing RFA often feel pain which is difficult to control as the mechanisms are unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Inhaled nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent sedative-analgesic-anxiolytic agent that may relieve anxiety and discomfort during CAF ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective randomized study, the effect of Inhaled N2O was compared with that of intravenous sedation with Nalbuphine during CAF ablation in 76 patients (64 +/- 13 years, 56 men). We used a 24 pole mapping catheter around the tricuspid annulus and a 8-mm tip ablation catheter for each patient. Forty-two patients (group 1) underwent radiofrequency (RF) application to the cavotricuspid isthmus 5 minutes after the beginning of inhalation of a (50% N2O/50% O2) mixture. Thirty-four patients (group 2), underwent the first RF application 15 minutes after the end of an infusion of Nalbuphine (20 mg delivered over 15 minutes). Ablation-related anxiety and discomfort were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with 0 correlating to the statement "no pain at all" and 100 with "the worst possible pain." The VAS score was determined at the end of each application. The number of RF applications (group 1; 10 +/- 8 vs group 2; 11 +/- 6, P = NS) and procedure duration (group 1; 75 +/- 53 minutes vs group 2; 72 +/- 45 minutes, P = NS), were similar for the two groups. N(2)O sedation compared with nalbuphine infusion reduced VAS for anxiety (10 mm +/- 8 vs 58 mm +/- 22, P < 0.05) and for discomfort (18 mm +/- 9 vs 45 mm +/- 34, P < 0.01), respectively. Although there was more frequent vomiting in group 1; 7 of 42 (17%) than in group 2; 3 of 34 (9%), P < 0.05, patients were less likely to have hypotension during the procedure 1 of 42 (2.5%) versus 4 of 34 (12%), P < 0.05, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Inhalation of a (50% N2O/50% O2) mixture during RF ablation for atrial flutter is a safe and efficient way to reduce anxiety and discomfort caused by RF applications.

摘要

背景

在常见心房扑动(CAF)患者中,射频消融(RFA)会引起不适。接受RFA的患者常感到疼痛且难以控制,因为其机制尚不清楚。

假设

吸入氧化亚氮(N2O)是一种有效的镇静 - 镇痛 - 抗焦虑药物,可能会减轻CAF消融过程中的焦虑和不适。

方法与结果

在一项前瞻性随机研究中,比较了76例患者(64±13岁,56例男性)在CAF消融期间吸入N2O与静脉注射纳布啡镇静的效果。我们为每位患者使用了一个环绕三尖瓣环的24极标测导管和一个8毫米尖端的消融导管。42例患者(第1组)在开始吸入(50% N2O/50% O2)混合气体5分钟后对三尖瓣峡部进行射频(RF)应用。34例患者(第2组)在静脉输注纳布啡(15分钟内输注20毫克)结束15分钟后进行首次RF应用。使用0至100毫米的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估与消融相关的焦虑和不适,0表示“完全无痛”,100表示“可能的最严重疼痛”。在每次应用结束时确定VAS评分。两组的RF应用次数(第1组;10±8次 vs 第2组;11±6次,P = 无统计学差异)和手术持续时间(第1组;75±53分钟 vs 第2组;72±45分钟,P = 无统计学差异)相似。与纳布啡输注相比,N(2)O镇静分别降低了焦虑的VAS评分(10毫米±8 vs 58毫米±22,P < 0.05)和不适的VAS评分(18毫米±9 vs 45毫米±34,P < 0.01)。尽管第1组呕吐更频繁;42例中有7例(17%),而第2组34例中有3例(9%),P < 0.05,但患者在手术期间发生低血压的可能性较小,第1组42例中有1例(2.5%),而第2组34例中有4例(12%),P < 0.05。

结论

在心房扑动的RF消融过程中吸入(50% N2O/50% O2)混合气体是减轻RF应用引起的焦虑和不适的一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验