Suppr超能文献

用于消融三尖瓣峡部依赖性右房扑动的远程磁导管导航系统的初步临床经验。

Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.

作者信息

Arya Arash, Kottkamp Hans, Piorkowski Christopher, Bollmann Andreas, Gerdes-Li Jin-Hong, Riahi Sam, Esato Masahiro, Hindricks Gerhard

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, University of Leipzig, Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 May;31(5):597-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01047.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A remote magnetic navigation system (MNS) is available and has been used with a 4-mm-tip magnetic catheter for radiofrequency (RF) ablation of some supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias; however, it has not been evaluated for the ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter (AFL). The present study evaluates the feasibility and efficiency of this system and the newly available 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter to perform RF ablation in patients with AFL.

METHODS

Twenty-six consecutive patients (23 men, mean age 64.6 +/- 9.6 years) underwent RF ablation using a remote MNS. RF ablation was performed with an 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter (70 degrees C, maximum power 70 W, 90 seconds). The endpoint of ablation was complete bidirectional isthmus block. To assess a possible learning curve, procedural data were compared between the first 14 (group 1) and the rest (group 2) of the patients.

RESULTS

The initial rhythm during ablation was AFL in 20 (19 counterclockwise and 1 clockwise) and sinus rhythm in six patients. Due to technical issues, the ablation in the 18th patient could not be done with the MNS, and so we switched to conventional ablation. The remote magnetic navigation and ablation procedure was successful in 24 of the 25 (96%) remaining patients with AFL. In one patient (patient 2), conventional catheter was used to complete the isthmus block after termination of AFL. The procedure, preparation, ablation, and fluoroscopy times (median [range]) were 53 (30-130) minutes, 28 (10-65) minutes, 25 (12-78) minutes, and 7.5 (3.2-20.8) minutes, respectively. Patients in group 2 had shorter procedure (45 [30-70] min vs 80 [57-130] min, P = 0.0001), preparation (25 [10-30] min vs 42 [30-65] min, P = 0.0001), ablation (20 [12-40] min vs 31 [20-78] min, P = 0.002), and fluoroscopy (7.2 [3.2-12.2] min vs 11.0 [5.4-20.8] min, P = 0.014) times. No complication occurred during the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Using a remote MNS and an 8-mm-tip magnetic catheter, ablation of AFL is feasible, safe, and effective. Our data suggest that there is a short learning curve for this procedure.

摘要

背景

一种远程磁导航系统(MNS)已投入使用,并已与一种4毫米尖端的磁导管一起用于某些室上性和室性心律失常的射频(RF)消融;然而,尚未对其用于消融三尖瓣峡部依赖性右房扑动(AFL)进行评估。本研究评估了该系统和新推出的8毫米尖端磁导管对AFL患者进行RF消融的可行性和效率。

方法

连续26例患者(23例男性,平均年龄64.6±9.6岁)接受了使用远程MNS的RF消融。使用8毫米尖端磁导管(70℃,最大功率70W,90秒)进行RF消融。消融终点为完全双向峡部阻滞。为评估可能的学习曲线,比较了前14例患者(第1组)和其余患者(第2组)的手术数据。

结果

消融期间的初始心律在20例患者中为AFL(19例逆时针,1例顺时针),6例患者为窦性心律。由于技术问题,第18例患者无法使用MNS进行消融,因此我们改用传统消融。在其余25例AFL患者中,24例(96%)的远程磁导航和消融手术成功。1例患者(患者2)在AFL终止后使用传统导管完成峡部阻滞。手术、准备、消融和透视时间(中位数[范围])分别为53(30-130)分钟、28(10-65)分钟、25(12-78)分钟和7.5(3.2-20.8)分钟。第2组患者的手术时间(45[30-70]分钟对80[57-130]分钟,P=0.0001)、准备时间(25[10-30]分钟对42[30-65]分钟,P=0.0001)、消融时间(20[12-40]分钟对31[20-78]分钟,P=0.002)和透视时间(7.2[3.2-12.2]分钟对11.0[5.4-20.8]分钟,P=0.014)更短。手术过程中未发生并发症。

结论

使用远程MNS和8毫米尖端磁导管,AFL消融是可行、安全且有效的。我们的数据表明该手术的学习曲线较短。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验