Chany Anne-Marie, Parakkat Julia, Yang Gang, Burr Deborah L, Marras William S
Biodynamics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Avenue, 210 Baker Systems, Columbus, OH 43210-1271, USA.
Spine J. 2006 May-Jun;6(3):296-305. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.10.011.
Psychosocial stressors have been associated with low back pain reporting. However, response to psychosocial risk factors may be dependent on the individual's personality type that, in turn, can affect muscle recruitment and spine loading. This study explores how personality might be associated with spine loading during repetitive lifting performed throughout an entire work shift.
Assess spine loading as a function of an individual's personality type during repetitive, long-term exposure to a materials handling tasks.
Laboratory experiment where experienced and inexperienced participants performed repetitive, asymmetric lifts at various load and lift frequency levels throughout a series of 8-hour exposure periods. Spine loads were monitored throughout the work period.
Twelve novice and 12 experienced materials handlers who were asymptomatic for back pain.
Spine compression, anterior-posterior (A/P) shear, and lateral shear at the L5-S1 level.
Participants were categorized into personality types based upon the Myers-Briggs personality type indicator. An electromyography-assisted biomechanical model was used to assess spine compression, A/P shear, and lateral shear throughout the exposure period.
The results indicate that intuitors had higher shear spinal loading regardless of moment exposure, lift frequency, and time through the work period, compared with the sensor personality type. In addition, higher spine compressive and shear forces occurred in the perceiver personality compared with the judgers' personality trait, regardless of moment and, often, lift frequency. Novice lifters typically experienced greater spine loading.
The results suggest that when there exists a personality-job environment mismatch, spinal loading increases via an increase in antagonistic co-contraction. The trends suggest that inherent personality characteristics may play a role in one's motor control strategies when performing a repetitive lifting task.
心理社会压力源与下背痛报告有关。然而,对心理社会风险因素的反应可能取决于个体的人格类型,而人格类型反过来又会影响肌肉募集和脊柱负荷。本研究探讨在整个工作班次的重复提举过程中,人格与脊柱负荷之间可能存在怎样的关联。
在长期重复接触物料搬运任务的过程中,评估脊柱负荷作为个体人格类型的函数。
实验室实验,有经验和无经验的参与者在一系列8小时的暴露期内,在不同负荷和提举频率水平下进行重复的不对称提举。在整个工作期间监测脊柱负荷。
12名无症状背痛的新手物料搬运工和12名有经验的物料搬运工。
L5-S1水平的脊柱压缩、前后(A/P)剪切力和侧向剪切力。
根据迈尔斯-布里格斯人格类型指标将参与者分为不同的人格类型。使用肌电图辅助生物力学模型在整个暴露期评估脊柱压缩、A/P剪切力和侧向剪切力。
结果表明,与感觉型人格类型相比,直觉型人格无论在何种时刻暴露、提举频率以及工作期间的时间如何,其脊柱剪切负荷都更高。此外,与判断型人格特质相比,感知型人格无论在何种时刻以及通常在何种提举频率下,都会出现更高的脊柱压缩力和剪切力。新手提举者通常经历更大的脊柱负荷。
结果表明,当存在人格-工作环境不匹配时,脊柱负荷会通过拮抗肌共同收缩的增加而增加。这些趋势表明,内在人格特征在执行重复提举任务时可能在个体的运动控制策略中发挥作用。