• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制高血压:赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与卡托普利-氢氯噻嗪对比。一项意大利多中心研究。

Controlling hypertension: lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide vs captopril-hydrochlorothiazide. An Italian multicentre study.

作者信息

Rappelli A

机构信息

Istituto di Patologia Medica, Universita degli Studi, Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:55-7; discussion 57-8.

PMID:1665178
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of a combination of lisinopril 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg once daily (L/HCTZ) was compared with a combination of captopril 50 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily (C/HCTZ) in a multicentre, open, randomized, parallel-group study involving mild to moderate hypertensive patients. A total of 87 patients were randomized to lisinopril and 87 to captopril. Six weeks of treatment with lisinopril or captopril lowered supine BP by 13.3/8.8 mm Hg and 8.7/6.5 mm Hg, respectively. After 4 weeks of combination treatment, BP 24 hours post dose fell to 144.0 +/- 1.3/88.1 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in the L/HCTZ group vs 146.8 +/- 1.3/90.3 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in the C/HCTZ group (P less than 0.05 DBP; differences in SBP were not significant, ns). The proportion of patients normalized (DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg) was 79.5% vs 72% for L/HCTZ and C/HCTZ, respectively (ns). A total of 93.6% of patients on L/HCTZ achieved a fall in DBP of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg, compared with 86.7% of patients on C/HCTZ (ns). One patient on lisinopril withdrew because of coughing. No statistically significant differences were observed between L/HCTZ and C/HCTZ with regard to adverse events. In conclusion, L/HCTZ was as well tolerated as C/HCTZ, but produced a greater fall in DBP.

摘要

在一项涉及轻至中度高血压患者的多中心、开放、随机、平行组研究中,比较了每日一次服用20毫克赖诺普利和12.5毫克氢氯噻嗪(L/HCTZ)的联合用药与每日一次服用50毫克卡托普利和25毫克氢氯噻嗪(C/HCTZ)的联合用药的疗效和耐受性。共有87例患者被随机分配至赖诺普利组,87例患者被随机分配至卡托普利组。用赖诺普利或卡托普利治疗6周后,仰卧位血压分别降低了13.3/8.8毫米汞柱和8.7/6.5毫米汞柱。联合治疗4周后,L/HCTZ组给药后24小时血压降至144.0±1.3/88.1±0.7毫米汞柱,而C/HCTZ组为146.8±1.3/90.3±0.7毫米汞柱(舒张压P<0.05;收缩压差异不显著,无统计学意义)。L/HCTZ组和C/HCTZ组血压正常(舒张压≤90毫米汞柱)的患者比例分别为79.5%和72%(无统计学意义)。L/HCTZ组共有93.6%的患者舒张压下降≥10毫米汞柱,而C/HCTZ组为86.7%(无统计学意义)。1例服用赖诺普利的患者因咳嗽退出。在不良事件方面,L/HCTZ和C/HCTZ之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。总之,L/HCTZ的耐受性与C/HCTZ相当,但能使舒张压有更大幅度的下降。

相似文献

1
Controlling hypertension: lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide vs captopril-hydrochlorothiazide. An Italian multicentre study.控制高血压:赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与卡托普利-氢氯噻嗪对比。一项意大利多中心研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:55-7; discussion 57-8.
2
Treating mild-to-moderate hypertension: a comparison of lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide fixed combination with captopril and hydrochlorothiazide free combination.治疗轻至中度高血压:赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪固定复方制剂与卡托普利和氢氯噻嗪自由联合用药的比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:59-60; discussion 61.
3
The results of a large multicentre study comparing low-dose lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide with the monocomponents.一项比较低剂量赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与单一成分药物的大型多中心研究结果。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:73-6.
4
[Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the lisinopril + hydrochlorothiazide and captopril + hydrochlorothiazide combinations in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension].赖诺普利+氢氯噻嗪与卡托普利+氢氯噻嗪联合用药治疗原发性高血压的安全性和有效性评估
Minerva Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;83(1-2):57-64.
5
Lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination vs lisinopril for the treatment of hypertension.赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪联合用药与赖诺普利治疗高血压的比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:53-4.
6
ACE inhibitors in mild to moderate hypertension: comparison of lisinopril and captopril administered once daily. French Cooperative Study Group.轻度至中度高血压患者使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂:赖诺普利与卡托普利每日一次给药的比较。法国合作研究小组
J Hum Hypertens. 1989 Jun;3 Suppl 1:23-8.
7
Introduction to lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination.赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪复方制剂介绍。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:49-51.
8
Lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination compared with the monocomponents in elderly hypertensive patients.赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪复方制剂与单一组分在老年高血压患者中的比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:85-9.
9
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
10
Efficacy and safety of delapril plus manidipine compared with enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate essential hypertension: results of a randomized trial.在轻度至中度原发性高血压患者中,比较地拉普利联合马尼地平与依那普利联合氢氯噻嗪的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验的结果
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and tolerability of delapril plus indapamide versus lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide combination treatments in mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized clinical study.地拉普利加吲达帕胺与赖诺普利加氢氯噻嗪联合治疗轻至中度高血压的疗效和耐受性:一项多中心随机临床研究。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2003 May;64(5):290-300. doi: 10.1016/S0011-393X(03)00084-5.