Kannry Joseph, Mukani Sonia, Myers Kristin
Division of Clinical Informatics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, USA.
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2006 Spring;20(2):84-99.
The experience of Mount Sinai Hospital is representative of the challenges and problems facing large academic medical centers in selecting an ambulatory EMR. The facility successfully revived a stalled process in a challenging financial climate, using a framework of science and rigorous investigation. The process incorporated several innovations: 1) There was a thorough review of medical informatics literature to develop a mission statement, determine practical objectives and guide the demonstration process; 2) The process involved rigorous investigation of vendor statements, industry statements and other institution's views of vendors; 3) The initiative focused on user-centric selection, and the survey instrument was scientifically and specifically designed to assess user feedback; 4) There was scientific analysis of validated findings and survey results at all steering meetings; 5) The process included an assessment of vendors' ability to support research by identifying funded and published research; 6) Selection involved meticulous total cost of ownership analysis to assess and compare real costs of implementing a vendor solution; and finally, 7) There were iterative meetings with stakeholders, executives and users to understand needs, address concerns and communicate the vision.
西奈山医院的经历代表了大型学术医疗中心在选择门诊电子病历系统时所面临的挑战和问题。该机构在充满挑战的财务环境中,通过科学框架和严格调查成功重启了停滞的流程。该流程包含多项创新:1)对医学信息学文献进行全面审查,以制定使命声明、确定实际目标并指导演示过程;2)该流程涉及对供应商声明、行业声明以及其他机构对供应商看法的严格调查;3)该计划侧重于以用户为中心的选择,并且调查工具经过科学且专门设计以评估用户反馈;4)在所有指导会议上对经过验证的发现和调查结果进行科学分析;5)该流程包括通过识别已获资助和发表的研究来评估供应商支持研究的能力;6)选择过程涉及细致的总体拥有成本分析,以评估和比较实施供应商解决方案的实际成本;最后,7)与利益相关者、管理人员和用户进行反复会议,以了解需求、解决问题并传达愿景。