Kerfoot Steven M, Norman M Ursula, Lapointe Benoit M, Bonder Claudine S, Zbytnuik Lori, Kubes Paul
Immunology Research Group, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Immunol. 2006 May 15;176(10):6225-34. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6225.
There has been a great deal of interest in adhesion molecules as targets for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory diseases. In this study, we systematically evaluate alpha(4) integrin and P-selectin as targets for therapy in murine models of multiple sclerosis-for the first time directly measuring the ability of their blockade to inhibit recruitment and relate this to clinical efficacy. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis was induced in C57BL/6 or SJL/J mice and intravital microscopy was used to quantify leukocyte interactions within the CNS microvasculature. In both strains, pretreatment with blocking Abs to either alpha(4) integrin or P-selectin reduced firm adhesion to a similar extent, but did not block it completely. The combination of the Abs was more effective than either Ab alone, although the degree of improvement was more evident in SJL/J mice. Similarly, dual blockade was much more effective at preventing the subsequent accumulation of fluorescently labeled leukocytes in the tissue in both strains. Despite evidence of blockade of leukocyte recruitment mechanisms, no clinical benefit was observed with anti-adhesion molecule treatments or genetic deletion of P-selectin in the C57BL/6 model, or in a pertussis toxin-modified model in SJL/J mice. In contrast, Abs to alpha(4) integrin resulted in a significant delay in the onset of clinical signs of disease in the standard SJL/J model. Despite evidence of a similar ability to block firm adhesion, Abs to P-selectin had no effect. Importantly, combined blockade of both adhesion molecules resulted in significantly better clinical outcome than anti-alpha(4) integrin alone.
作为治疗多发性硬化症及其他炎症性疾病的靶点,黏附分子已引发了广泛关注。在本研究中,我们首次系统评估了α(4)整合素和P-选择素作为多发性硬化症小鼠模型治疗靶点的效果——直接测量其阻断剂抑制募集的能力,并将其与临床疗效相关联。在C57BL/6或SJL/J小鼠中诱导实验性自身免疫性脑脊髓炎,并采用活体显微镜术量化中枢神经系统微血管内的白细胞相互作用。在这两种品系中,用抗α(4)整合素或P-选择素的阻断抗体进行预处理,均可在相似程度上降低牢固黏附,但不能完全阻断。抗体联合使用比单独使用任一抗体更有效,尽管在SJL/J小鼠中改善程度更明显。同样,双重阻断在防止两种品系的组织中随后荧光标记白细胞的积累方面更为有效。尽管有证据表明白细胞募集机制被阻断,但在C57BL/6模型中,或在SJL/J小鼠的百日咳毒素修饰模型中,抗黏附分子治疗或P-选择素基因缺失均未观察到临床益处。相比之下,在标准SJL/J模型中,抗α(4)整合素抗体可显著延迟疾病临床症状的出现。尽管有证据表明其阻断牢固黏附的能力相似,但抗P-选择素抗体却没有效果。重要的是,两种黏附分子的联合阻断比单独使用抗α(4)整合素产生了显著更好的临床结果。