Shreffler Wayne G
Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, New York 10029, USA.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Jun;6(3):226-33. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000225165.83144.2f.
The diagnosis of immediate hypersensitivity relies on specific IgE and history. Because of low specificity, however, provocation challenges are often necessary. Furthermore, IgE testing does not predict features such as reaction severity; nor can it discriminate cross-reactivity from multiple sensitizations. Direct and passive basophil activation tests may address these needs. In addition, measuring basophil activation ex vivo may be useful for monitoring patients with food allergies.
Several papers using basophil activation tests demonstrate comparable sensitivity and specificity to current testing for food allergy. Flow-based basophil activation tests have also been used to assess functional characteristics of patient IgE. Finally, several activation phenotypes have been identified as markers of allergic inflammation in vivo; these phenotypes appear to correspond to earlier reports of spontaneous histamine-releasing basophils in patients with active allergic inflammation.
Although in their early stages, direct basophil activation tests may prove to be useful in the clinic. Indirect basophil activation studies are useful when applied to compare functional aspects of IgE. Identification of basophil activation ex vivo is a promising approach for monitoring allergic inflammation.
速发型超敏反应的诊断依赖于特异性IgE和病史。然而,由于特异性较低,激发试验往往是必要的。此外,IgE检测无法预测反应严重程度等特征;也无法区分交叉反应性与多重致敏。直接和被动嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验可能满足这些需求。此外,体外测量嗜碱性粒细胞活化对于监测食物过敏患者可能有用。
几篇使用嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验的论文表明,其与目前食物过敏检测的敏感性和特异性相当。基于流式细胞术的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验也已用于评估患者IgE的功能特性。最后,已鉴定出几种活化表型作为体内过敏性炎症的标志物;这些表型似乎与早期关于活动性过敏性炎症患者中自发释放组胺的嗜碱性粒细胞的报道一致。
尽管直接嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验尚处于早期阶段,但可能在临床上证明有用。间接嗜碱性粒细胞活化研究在用于比较IgE的功能方面时很有用。体外鉴定嗜碱性粒细胞活化是监测过敏性炎症的一种有前途的方法。