Freckleton Robert P, Noble David, Webb Thomas J
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom.
Am Nat. 2006 Feb;167(2):260-75. doi: 10.1086/498655. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
Positive abundance-occupancy relationships (a relationship between the number of sites a species occupies and the average density of individuals in occupied sites) are widespread through a range of taxa. The simplest model for this is the "vital rates" model, which proposes that habitat suitability varies spatially; increasing average habitat quality thus leads to simultaneous increases in average densities within occupied areas, as well as the total area that is habitable. This model has not been tested. We develop a general analytical version of this model and show that it predicts that the skewness of population size or aggregation of individuals within sites should vary systematically with density and occupancy, depending on the distribution of habitat suitability, and that the variance in occupancy should be highest at low densities. We compare these predictions with data from the British Trust for Ornithology's Common Birds Census, and we find systematic changes in both variance and skewness of density, both intra- and interspecifically.
正的丰度-占有率关系(即一个物种所占据的地点数量与被占据地点中个体的平均密度之间的关系)在一系列分类群中广泛存在。对此最简单的模型是“生命率”模型,该模型提出栖息地适宜性在空间上存在差异;因此,平均栖息地质量的提高会导致被占据区域内的平均密度以及可居住总面积同时增加。这个模型尚未经过检验。我们开发了该模型的一个通用分析版本,并表明它预测种群大小的偏度或地点内个体的聚集应根据栖息地适宜性的分布随密度和占有率系统地变化,并且占有率的方差在低密度时应最高。我们将这些预测与英国鸟类学信托基金会的常见鸟类普查数据进行比较,发现密度的方差和偏度在种内和种间都存在系统性变化。