Plachokova Adelina S, van den Dolder Juliette, Stoelinga Paul J, Jansen John A
Department of Periodontology and Biomaterials, Radboud University Nijmegen, Medical Centere Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):305-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01208.x.
The effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on bone regeneration, in combination with an osteoconductive material, was evaluated in a rat model. Cranial defects, 6.2 mm in diameter, were filled with HA/beta-TCP particles, HA/beta-TCP particles combined with PRP and HA/beta-TCP particles combined with PRP gel, where some were left empty as a control. After 4 weeks of implantation histological, histomorphometrical and micro-computed tomography analyses revealed no difference in new bone formation among the groups. Further, no additional effect of PRP gel in comparison with PRP liquid was detected, except for the increased handling capacity of the graft. These findings suggest that PRP had no positive effect on bone formation in addition to an osteoconductive material after an implantation period of 4 weeks. Also, no negative effect was seen, and neither PRP nor HA/beta-TCP hampered bone ingrowth into the defects.
在大鼠模型中评估了富血小板血浆(PRP)与骨传导材料联合使用对骨再生的影响。直径6.2毫米的颅骨缺损分别用HA/β-TCP颗粒、HA/β-TCP颗粒与PRP联合、HA/β-TCP颗粒与PRP凝胶填充,部分缺损留作对照。植入4周后,组织学、组织形态计量学和微型计算机断层扫描分析显示,各组之间新骨形成无差异。此外,除了移植物的操作能力增强外,未检测到PRP凝胶与PRP液体相比有额外效果。这些发现表明,在植入4周后,除骨传导材料外,PRP对骨形成没有积极作用。此外,未观察到负面影响,PRP和HA/β-TCP均未阻碍骨长入缺损。