Koch Stefan P, Steinbrink Jens, Villringer Arno, Obrig Hellmuth
Berlin NeuroImaging Centre, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4940-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3989-05.2006.
We performed an electroencephalography and optical topography study simultaneously exploring electrophysiological and vascular response magnitude as a function of stimulus frequency. To elicit a response in the visual cortex, subjects were exposed to flicker frequencies varying from 1 to 25 Hz (1 Hz steps, eyes closed). Extending the standard view to compare magnitudes of the evoked neuronal to the evoked vascular response, we additionally investigated modulations of alpha-power, a marker of "background" EEG activity. The results show two discrepancies between the electrophysiological and vascular response: (1) VEP and alpha-power exhibit a discontinuous peak when stimulating at the individual alpha-frequency (IAF) (approximately 10-11 Hz), indicating resonance between background oscillations and evoked response; this is not mirrored by the vascular response. (2) The vascular response, in contrast, steadily increases up to a maximum at 7-8 Hz and slightly decreases with higher frequencies. This continuous frequency dependence is partly reflected by the decrease in alpha-power up to frequencies of 8-9 Hz and a slight increase in alpha-power beyond the IAF resonance. Although indicating an inverse relationship between alpha-power and vascular response, the frequency dependence of the evoked response does not show such a correlation. Thus, electrophysiological resonance between an individual's alpha-frequency and isofrequent stimulation is not mirrored by the vascular response. Also, spontaneous background EEG activity is an important modulator of the vascular response magnitude. We discuss these deviations from a simple one-to-one translation between evoked potential and vascular response amplitude in the light of questions concerning synchronization, attenuation, and induction of background oscillations such as the alpha-rhythm.
我们同时进行了脑电图和光学地形图研究,以探索电生理和血管反应幅度作为刺激频率的函数。为了在视觉皮层引发反应,让受试者暴露于1至25赫兹(1赫兹步长,闭眼)变化的闪烁频率下。扩展标准观点以比较诱发神经元反应与诱发血管反应的幅度,我们还研究了α波功率的调制,α波功率是“背景”脑电图活动的一个指标。结果显示电生理和血管反应之间存在两个差异:(1)当以个体α频率(IAF)(约10 - 11赫兹)进行刺激时,视觉诱发电位(VEP)和α波功率呈现出不连续的峰值,表明背景振荡与诱发反应之间存在共振;血管反应并未反映出这一点。(2)相比之下,血管反应在7 - 8赫兹时稳步增加至最大值,并随着频率升高而略有下降。这种连续的频率依赖性部分反映在α波功率在8 - 9赫兹频率之前下降以及在IAF共振频率之后α波功率略有增加。虽然表明α波功率与血管反应之间存在反比关系,但诱发反应的频率依赖性并未显示出这种相关性。因此,个体α频率与同频刺激之间的电生理共振并未在血管反应中体现出来。此外,自发的背景脑电图活动是血管反应幅度的一个重要调节因素。我们根据关于同步、衰减以及背景振荡(如α节律)的诱导等问题,讨论了诱发电位与血管反应幅度之间简单的一对一转换的这些偏差。