Howes B W
Southmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2006 May;61(5):488-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04611.x.
The aim of this study is to compare the brightness of laryngoscope light between instruments, and the variability within the same instrument. A secondary aim is to compare the light from a reusable laryngoscope with a single use design. Testing equipment was constructed which provided a qualitative measure of light output from laryngoscopes. Anaesthetists assessed the minimum acceptable brightness for intubation using the intubating mannikin and a variable brightness laryngoscope. Laryngoscopes in anaesthetic rooms around the hospital were then tested repeatedly, and the results were compared to the anaesthetists' opinions. There was considerable intersubject and intrasubject variation in the reusable design, often failing to satisfy the minimum brightness. The single use blades were found to be brighter and more reliable than reusable blades.
本研究的目的是比较不同喉镜器械的灯光亮度,以及同一器械内的亮度差异。次要目的是比较可重复使用喉镜与一次性使用设计喉镜的灯光。构建了测试设备,以对喉镜的光输出进行定性测量。麻醉医生使用插管人体模型和可变亮度喉镜评估插管所需的最低可接受亮度。然后对医院麻醉室中的喉镜进行反复测试,并将结果与麻醉医生的意见进行比较。在可重复使用的设计中,受试者间和受试者内存在相当大的差异,常常无法满足最低亮度要求。发现一次性使用的刀片比可重复使用的刀片更亮且更可靠。