Gradl Georg, Gaida Susanne, Finke Burkhard, Gierer Philip, Mittlmeier Thomas, Vollmar Brigitte
Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Rostock, Germany.
Neurosci Lett. 2006 Jul 24;402(3):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.04.007. Epub 2006 May 3.
As CRPS I frequently develops after tissue trauma, we proposed that an exaggerated inflammatory response to tissue trauma may underlie CRPS I. Therefore, we studied the vascular inflammatory, nociceptive and apoptotic sequelae of (i) soft tissue trauma and (ii) exaggerated soft tissue trauma in comparison to those of (iii) sciatic nerve chronic constriction injury, modeling CRPS II. Standardized soft tissue trauma (TR) was induced by means of a controlled impact injury technique in the hind limb of pentobarbital-anesthetized rats. Additional animals received soft tissue trauma and femoral arterial infusion of mediator-enriched supernatant achieved by homogenization and centrifugation of traumatized muscle tissue in order to provoke an exaggerated trauma response (ETR). Infusion of supernatant of non-traumatized muscle served as control intervention (STR, sham trauma response). Neuropathy was induced by chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve (CCI). Untreated animals served as controls (CO). Detailed nociceptive testing showed temporarily decreased mechanical pain thresholds in ETR animals that resolved within 14 days, while TR and STR animals, i.e. those with singular limb trauma, and controls remained free of pain. Neither cold- nor heat-evoked allodynia developed in post-traumatic animals, whereas CCI animals presented the well-known pattern of ongoing neuropathic pain. Using high-resolution in vivo multifluorescence microscopy, muscle tissue of traumatized animals revealed an enhanced inflammatory response that was found most pronounced in ETR animals. CCI of the sciatic nerve was not accompanied by tissue inflammation; however, induced myocyte apoptosis. Collectively, these data indicate that exaggeration of trauma response induces signs and symptoms of acute CRPS I. Pain perception displays differences to that in CRPS II. Apoptosis turns out to be a distinctive marker for CRPS, warranting further evaluation in clinical studies.
由于复杂性区域疼痛综合征I型(CRPS I)常发生于组织创伤后,我们提出对组织创伤的过度炎症反应可能是CRPS I的基础。因此,我们研究了(i)软组织创伤和(ii)与(iii)坐骨神经慢性压迫损伤(模拟CRPS II型)相比的过度软组织创伤后的血管炎症、伤害感受和凋亡后遗症。通过在戊巴比妥麻醉大鼠的后肢采用可控冲击损伤技术诱导标准化软组织创伤(TR)。另外的动物接受软组织创伤并经股动脉输注通过对创伤肌肉组织进行匀浆和离心获得的富含介质的上清液,以引发过度创伤反应(ETR)。输注未创伤肌肉的上清液作为对照干预(STR,假创伤反应)。通过坐骨神经慢性压迫损伤(CCI)诱导神经病变。未治疗的动物作为对照(CO)。详细的伤害感受测试显示,ETR动物的机械性疼痛阈值暂时降低,并在14天内恢复,而TR和STR动物,即那些有单一肢体创伤的动物以及对照组仍无疼痛。创伤后动物均未出现冷或热诱发的异常性疼痛,而CCI动物呈现出众所周知的持续性神经性疼痛模式。使用高分辨率体内多荧光显微镜,创伤动物的肌肉组织显示出增强的炎症反应,在ETR动物中最为明显。坐骨神经CCI未伴有组织炎症;然而,诱导了心肌细胞凋亡。总体而言,这些数据表明创伤反应的过度会诱发急性CRPS I的体征和症状。疼痛感知与CRPS II型有所不同。凋亡被证明是CRPS的一个独特标志物,值得在临床研究中进一步评估。