Suppr超能文献

非体外循环冠状动脉手术急性转为体外循环冠状动脉手术后的发病率和死亡率。

Morbidity and mortality following acute conversion from off-pump to on-pump coronary surgery.

作者信息

Reeves Barnaby C, Ascione Raimondo, Caputo Massimo, Angelini Gianni D

机构信息

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jun;29(6):941-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.03.018. Epub 2006 May 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Many studies have described reduced morbidity in hospital and equivalent midterm outcomes with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery compared to conventional CABG (CABG-CPB). However, OPCAB is sometimes converted acutely to CABG-CPB. We describe the risk of acute conversion and compare patients' outcomes for acutely converted OPCAB with unconverted OPCAB and CABG-CPB.

METHODS

Consecutive acute conversions, i.e. OPCAB patients in whom CPB was instituted urgently for hemodynamic or electrical instability, cardiac arrest or uncontrolled bleeding, were compared with propensity-matched unconverted OPCAB and CABG-CPB patients. Relative risks of death and complications in hospital, and subsequent survival were estimated.

RESULTS

The risk of acute conversion between 1996 and 2004 was 1.1% (27/2492): 5.1% in the first 2 years, 2.2% in the third year and 0.8% subsequently. Odds ratios for death in hospital compared to unconverted OPCAB and CABG-CPB were 4.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-29.1) and 4.7 (95% CI 1.03-21.1), respectively, and ranged from 0 to 4.5 for serious complications. Converted patients had an increased hazard of death for 3 years after surgery compared to unconverted OPCAB (hazard ratio 3.21, 95% CI 1.20-8.59) and CABG-CPB patients (hazard ratio 3.23, 95% CI 1.41-7.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Experienced OPCAB surgeons have a low risk of acute conversion. Acutely converted patients have a moderately increased risk of death and serious complications in hospital. These risks are difficult to quantify precisely because conversion is rare.

摘要

目的

许多研究表明,与传统体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG - CPB)相比,非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术(OPCAB)可降低住院发病率并取得相当的中期疗效。然而,OPCAB有时会紧急转换为CABG - CPB。我们描述了急性转换的风险,并比较急性转换的OPCAB患者与未转换的OPCAB患者及CABG - CPB患者的预后。

方法

将连续的急性转换病例,即因血流动力学或电不稳定、心脏骤停或无法控制的出血而紧急建立体外循环的OPCAB患者,与倾向评分匹配的未转换的OPCAB患者及CABG - CPB患者进行比较。估计住院期间死亡和并发症的相对风险以及随后的生存率。

结果

1996年至2004年期间急性转换的风险为1.1%(27/2492):前两年为5.1%,第三年为2.2%,随后为0.8%。与未转换的OPCAB和CABG - CPB相比,住院死亡的比值比分别为4.4(95%置信区间(CI)0.67 - 29.1)和4.7(95%CI 1.03 - 21.1),严重并发症的比值比范围为0至4.5。与未转换的OPCAB患者相比,转换患者术后3年的死亡风险增加(风险比3.21,95%CI 1.20 - 8.59),与CABG - CPB患者相比也是如此(风险比3.23,95%CI 1.41 - 7.39)。

结论

经验丰富的OPCAB外科医生急性转换的风险较低。急性转换的患者住院期间死亡和严重并发症的风险适度增加。由于转换很少见,这些风险难以精确量化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验