Schatz Michael, Zeiger Robert S, Vollmer William M, Mosen David, Apter Andrea J, Stibolt Thomas B, Leong Albin, Johnson Michael S, Mendoza Guillermo, Cook E Francis
Department of Allergy (San Diego), Kaiser-Permanente Medical Care Program, Kaiser-Permanente Medical Center, CA 92111, USA.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 May;117(5):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.053. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
Asthma control has been defined clinically by using validated tools, but an asthma control scale using administrative data has not been reported.
We sought to validate a beta-agonist asthma control scale derived from administrative data.
Surveys that included validated asthma symptom and control tools were completed by a random sample of 2250 health maintenance organization members aged 18 to 56 years with persistent asthma. Linked computerized pharmacy data provided beta-agonist canister and oral corticosteroid dispensings. The proposed 4-level asthma control scale was based on the number of short-acting beta-agonist canisters dispensed in 12 months. Construct validity and predictive validity were assessed.
For construct validity, factor analysis showed significant loading of the beta-agonist scale on the symptom control factor, and the beta-agonist scale was significantly related to the validated asthma control and symptom scales (r = 0.31, P < .0001). For predictive validity, each progressive level of the proposed beta-agonist control scale was associated with an increased risk of subsequent asthma hospitalizations or emergency department visits and oral corticosteroid use, independent of prior use.
A scale based on the number of beta-agonists dispensed in a 1-year period and derived from administrative data reflects asthma symptom control over that period of time. This scale can help identify patients who are at risk for future acute asthma health care use.
This information can be used in population management and by clinicians to assess long-term asthma control and identify patients who need intervention to prevent future morbidity.
哮喘控制已通过使用经过验证的工具在临床上进行定义,但尚未有基于管理数据的哮喘控制量表的报道。
我们试图验证一种从管理数据中得出的β-受体激动剂哮喘控制量表。
对2250名年龄在18至56岁之间患有持续性哮喘的健康维护组织成员进行随机抽样,完成包含经过验证的哮喘症状和控制工具的调查。关联的计算机化药房数据提供了β-受体激动剂吸入器和口服糖皮质激素的配药情况。所提议的4级哮喘控制量表基于12个月内短效β-受体激动剂吸入器的配药数量。评估了结构效度和预测效度。
对于结构效度,因子分析显示β-受体激动剂量表在症状控制因子上有显著载荷,且β-受体激动剂量表与经过验证的哮喘控制和症状量表显著相关(r = 0.31,P <.0001)。对于预测效度,所提议的β-受体激动剂控制量表的每个递进水平都与随后哮喘住院或急诊就诊以及口服糖皮质激素使用的风险增加相关,与先前的使用情况无关。
一种基于1年内β-受体激动剂配药数量且从管理数据中得出的量表反映了该时间段内的哮喘症状控制情况。该量表有助于识别未来有急性哮喘医疗需求风险的患者。
此信息可用于人群管理,临床医生可据此评估长期哮喘控制情况,并识别需要干预以预防未来发病的患者。