Karagoz Irfan, Kartal M Kemal
Gazi University, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Maltepe, Ankara, Turkey.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006 May;32(5):741-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.02.1404.
Previously, the temperature rise (deltaT) caused by diagnostic ultrasound and the AUIM/NEMA-defined thermal indices were examined to evaluate whether these indices were reasonable indicators of potential bioeffects due to ultrasound heating in the absence of a residual temperature rise (RTR). In our study, deltaT induced by diagnostic ultrasound exposures was estimated in the presence of an RTR using the Bioheat Transfer Equation. To evaluate deltaT/TIS in the presence of an RTR, 11 frequencies, eight cooling times, eight insonation times for the second ultrasound examination, and three source powers for a circular aperture (A(aprt)< or = 1 cm2) were investigated. In our comparison of the ratios of deltaT/TIS in the absence and presence of an RTR, a higher deltaT/TIS value was obtained in the examination with the RTR. We showed that the deltaT/TIS value is equal to 2.88 in the presence of an RTR, whereas the deltaT/TIS value without the RTR equals 1.90. In the presence of the RTR, although the TIS does not inform the user of higher ultrasound heating due to TIS values that do not exceed 1.00, deltaT reaches 2.62 degrees C, and the deltaT without the RTR reaches 1.68 degrees C in the case of a TIS value that does not exceed 1.00. These results suggest that, for nonscanned mode situations where soft tissue is insonated, the TIS should not be regarded as a reliable indicator of potential bioeffects due to ultrasound heating in the presence of the RTR. Our study also indicates the necessity for a new indicator that provides the clinical user with accurate in vivo temperature rise feedback (possibly even true deltaT), and includes adding an exposure time component to the Bio-Heat Equation model.
此前,研究了诊断超声引起的温度升高(ΔT)以及AUIM/NEMA定义的热指数,以评估在不存在残余温度升高(RTR)的情况下,这些指数是否是超声加热导致潜在生物效应的合理指标。在我们的研究中,使用生物热传递方程在存在RTR的情况下估算诊断超声暴露引起的ΔT。为了评估存在RTR时的ΔT/TIS,研究了11个频率、8个冷却时间、第二次超声检查的8个照射时间以及圆形孔径(A(aprt)≤1 cm2)的3个源功率。在我们对不存在RTR和存在RTR时ΔT/TIS比值的比较中,在有RTR的检查中获得了更高的ΔT/TIS值。我们发现,存在RTR时ΔT/TIS值等于2.88,而不存在RTR时ΔT/TIS值等于1.90。在存在RTR的情况下,尽管TIS由于不超过1.00的值而未告知用户更高的超声加热情况,但在TIS值不超过1.00的情况下,ΔT达到2.62℃,不存在RTR时的ΔT达到1.68℃。这些结果表明,对于软组织被照射的非扫描模式情况,在存在RTR的情况下,TIS不应被视为超声加热导致潜在生物效应的可靠指标。我们的研究还表明需要一种新的指标,为临床用户提供准确的体内温度升高反馈(甚至可能是真实的ΔT),并在生物热方程模型中加入暴露时间成分。