• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

黄斑脱离的孔源性视网膜脱离巩膜扣带术后的视力恢复

Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

作者信息

Liu Fang, Meyer Carsten H, Mennel Stefan, Hoerle Steffen, Kroll Peter

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(3):174-80. doi: 10.1159/000091761.

DOI:10.1159/000091761
PMID:16679792
Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this study was to investigate the functional results after scleral buckling (SB) surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), with more or less than 7 days' duration of macular detachment (DMD). The secondary outcome measure was to determine the long-term functional results in these two groups 5 years after SB surgery.

METHODS

The retrospective studies included 96 eyes of 96 patients with primary, uncomplicated, macula-off RRD. Two studies, one with a short-term follow-up and one with a long-term follow-up, were performed, and in both studies the eyes were divided into two groups according to the DMD. In study I, 96 patients were divided into DMD <or=7 days (n = 73) and prolonged DMD more than 7 days (n = 23) with a postoperative follow-up of at least 3 months (mean 43.5 months). In a subgroup analysis, patients were divided into acute DMD <or=3 days (n = 37) and subacute DMD >or=4 days and <or=7 days (n = 36). Study II included 47 patients with a follow-up of at least 5 years (mean 6 years). All patients were divided into(subacute) DMD <or=7 days (n = 36) and (prolonged) DMD of >7 days (n = 11). Additional preoperative predictive factors including DMD, preoperative visual acuity (VA) and patients' age at the time of the RRD were correlated with the postoperative VA.

RESULTS

In study I, the mean final VA was significantly better (0.45) after a DMD of less than or equal to 7 days, compared to patients with a DMD of more than 7 days (0.22; Student's t test, p = 0.02). VA >or=0.4 was achieved in 68% with a subacute DMD compared to 52% in patients with prolonged DMD (chi(2) test, p < 0.001). However, the postoperative VA (0.48 +/- 0.09) in eyes with DMD of 1-3 days was similar (0.42 +/- 0.07) to eyes with DMD of 4-7 days (Student's t test, p = 0.455). We divided the 96 patients into 2 groups according to a preoperative VA. Eyes with a preoperative VA <or=0.1 (n = 62) had a significantly lower final VA compared to eyes with a preoperative VA >0.1 (n = 34; Student's t test, p < 0.001). Patients 75 years of age or younger were more likely to achieve a VA of 0.4 or better after SB surgery than older patients (more than 75 years; chi(2) test, p = 0.008). In study II, VA improved (by a mean of 1.60 +/- 0.02 lines) during the follow-up period from 0.32 +/- 0.08 at the 3-month follow-up to 0.46 +/- 0.10 at the 5-year follow-up. Eyes with a subacute DMD had a significantly better VA than eyes with a prolonged DMD (Student's t test, p = 0.004). Patients aged 75 years or less were more likely to achieve a VA of 0.4 or better than patients older than 75 (chi(2) test, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The time point of SB surgery has no statistical impact on the final visual recovery in patients with an acute primary macular-off RRD of less than or equal to 7 days. A delay of SB surgery within this time frame does not contribute to an impaired final visual outcome. There was no evidence, that primary macula-off RRDs are emergencies, which cannot wait for a systemic evaluation of the RRD and surgical treatment at the next available scheduled day. A preoperative VA of more than 0.1 and patients' age under 60 years at presentation had an additional prognostic value on the final outcome. Surgeons should be aware that visual function after reattachment may continue to improve over a long period. This study provides useful guidelines for the clinical management of macula-off RRD and the assessment of potential visual recovery in patients after successful SB surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是调查黄斑脱离的孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)患者在巩膜扣带术(SB)后,黄斑脱离持续时间(DMD)为7天及以内或超过7天时的功能结果。次要结果指标是确定SB手术后5年这两组患者的长期功能结果。

方法

回顾性研究纳入96例原发性、无并发症的黄斑脱离RRD患者的96只眼。进行了两项研究,一项短期随访研究和一项长期随访研究,在两项研究中,根据DMD将眼部分为两组。在研究I中,96例患者被分为DMD≤7天组(n = 73)和DMD超过7天的延长组(n = 23),术后随访至少3个月(平均43.5个月)。在亚组分析中,患者被分为急性DMD≤3天组(n = 37)和亚急性DMD≥4天且≤7天组(n = 36)。研究II纳入47例随访至少5年(平均6年)的患者。所有患者被分为(亚急性)DMD≤7天组(n = 36)和(延长)DMD>7天组(n = 11)。其他术前预测因素包括DMD、术前视力(VA)和RRD发生时患者的年龄与术后VA相关。

结果

在研究I中,DMD小于或等于7天的患者最终平均视力(0.45)明显优于DMD超过7天的患者(0.22;Student t检验,p = 0.02)。亚急性DMD患者中68%的视力≥0.4,而DMD延长患者中这一比例为52%(卡方检验,p < 0.001)。然而,DMD为1 - 3天的眼术后视力(0.48±0.09)与DMD为4 - 7天的眼相似(0.42±0.07)(Student t检验,p = 0.455)。我们根据术前VA将96例患者分为两组。术前VA≤0.1的眼(n = 62)最终视力明显低于术前VA>0.1的眼(n = 34;Student t检验,p < 0.001)。75岁及以下的患者比老年患者(超过75岁)在SB手术后更有可能获得0.4或更好的视力(卡方检验,p = 0.008)。在研究II中,随访期间视力有所改善(平均改善1.60±0.02行),从3个月随访时的0.32±0.08提高到5年随访时的0.46±0.10。亚急性DMD的眼视力明显优于DMD延长的眼(Student t检验,p = 0.004)。75岁及以下的患者比75岁以上的患者更有可能获得0.4或更好的视力(卡方检验,p = 0.003)。

结论

对于急性原发性黄斑脱离RRD且DMD小于或等于7天的患者,SB手术时间点对最终视力恢复无统计学影响。在此时间范围内延迟SB手术不会导致最终视力结果受损。没有证据表明原发性黄斑脱离RRD是紧急情况,不能等待对RRD进行系统评估并在接下来的可用预定日期进行手术治疗。术前视力超过0.1且就诊时患者年龄小于60岁对最终结果有额外的预后价值。外科医生应意识到视网膜复位后的视觉功能可能会在很长一段时间内持续改善。本研究为黄斑脱离RRD的临床管理以及成功SB手术后患者潜在视力恢复的评估提供了有用的指导。

相似文献

1
Visual recovery after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.黄斑脱离的孔源性视网膜脱离巩膜扣带术后的视力恢复
Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(3):174-80. doi: 10.1159/000091761.
2
Scleral buckling surgery after macula-off retinal detachment: worse visual outcome after more than 6 days.黄斑脱离视网膜脱离后的巩膜扣带术:超过6天后视力预后更差。
Ophthalmology. 2007 Apr;114(4):705-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Dec 27.
3
Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment.视网膜脱离巩膜扣带术后的视力恢复
Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1734-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.064.
4
The effect of duration of macular detachment on results after the scleral buckle repair of primary, macula-off retinal detachments.黄斑脱离持续时间对原发性黄斑脱离巩膜扣带修复术后结果的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2002 Jan;109(1):146-52. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00886-7.
5
Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery.巩膜扣带术后 6 个月的再脱离发生率。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;88(2):199-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01425.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
6
Visual outcome in primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with scleral buckling.巩膜扣带术治疗原发性黄斑脱离孔源性视网膜脱离的视觉预后
J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Mar;103(3):212-7.
7
Persistent subretinal fluid after successful scleral buckle surgery for macula-off retinal detachment.成功巩膜扣带手术后黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离仍有视网膜下液存留。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Dec;124(23):4007-11.
8
[Optical coherence tomography: anatomic and functional outcome after scleral buckling surgery in macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment].[光学相干断层扫描:黄斑脱离性孔源性视网膜脱离巩膜扣带术后的解剖和功能结果]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Aug;230(8):814-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328422. Epub 2013 May 13.
9
Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 542 eyes.巩膜扣带术联合平坦部玻璃体切除术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离:542 眼分析。
Curr Eye Res. 2014 Feb;39(2):204-11. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2013.838270. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
10
Surgical outcome of scleral buckling compared with scleral buckling with vitrectomy for treatment of macula-off retinal detachment.巩膜扣带术与巩膜扣带联合玻璃体切除术治疗黄斑脱离性视网膜脱离的手术效果比较
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009 Nov-Dec;40(6):539-47. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20091030-02.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Factors for Visual Postsurgical Outcome in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment-A Systematic Review.孔源性视网膜脱离术后视觉预后的相关因素——一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 16;14(6):2016. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062016.
2
Prediction of Visual Outcome After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.利用人工智能技术预测孔源性视网膜脱离手术后的视力结果。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 May 1;13(5):17. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.5.17.
3
Reversing the paradigm on the urgency of acute retinal detachments defined by their foveal status: when off may be more urgent than on.
颠覆基于黄斑状态定义的急性视网膜脱离紧迫性的范式:脱离时可能比附着时更紧急。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 19;9(1):e001668. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001668.
4
Correlation between multifocal electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography findings with visual acuity after vitrectomy surgery for retinal detachment: an observational study.视网膜脱离玻璃体切除术后多焦视网膜电图及光学相干断层扫描结果与视力的相关性:一项观察性研究。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Jan 23;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00527-7.
5
An Evaluation of the Repeatability of Visual Function Following Surgical Repair of Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离手术后视功能可重复性评估。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Nov 1;12(11):35. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.11.35.
6
Effect of Changes in Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment on Functional and Anatomical Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 812 Cases from the Years 2004 to 2012.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离手术治疗策略变化对功能和解剖学预后的影响:对2004年至2012年812例病例的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2278. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062278.
7
The urgency of surgical treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.孔源性视网膜脱离手术治疗的紧迫性。
Ophthalmologe. 2021 Jul;118(Suppl 2):160-165. doi: 10.1007/s00347-021-01364-x. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
8
[The urgency of surgical treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment].[孔源性视网膜脱离手术治疗的紧迫性]
Ophthalmologe. 2020 Sep;117(9):858-865. doi: 10.1007/s00347-020-01191-6.
9
Predictors for recovery of macular function after surgery for primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.原发性孔源性视网膜脱离外路手术后黄斑功能恢复的预测因素。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;40(3):609-616. doi: 10.1007/s10792-019-01219-0. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
10
Functional and morphological results of treatment of macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade.采用玻璃体切除术联合六氟化硫气体填塞治疗黄斑在位和黄斑脱离的孔源性视网膜脱离的功能和形态学结果
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 May 24;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1120-3.