Paltrinieri Saverio, Spagnolo Valentina, Giordano Alessia, Gelmetti Daniela, Comazzi Stefano
Dipartimento di Patologia Animale, Igiene e Sanità Pubblica Veterinaria-Università di Milano, Italy.
J Cell Physiol. 2006 Aug;208(2):446-50. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20682.
It has been postulated that Doppel (Dpl) and Prion (PrP) proteins have yet undetermined interactions, since Dpl is overexpressed in transgenic PrP-deficient mice. In this study we investigated the expression levels of Dpl and PrP on lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils (PMNs) isolated from bovine blood and incubated (2 and 18 h) with TNFalpha, IL-1, IL-2, IL-8, C5a, IFNgamma, anti-PrP, and anti-Dpl antibodies by flow cytometry. The isolation procedures yielded cell populations with high purity, viability and recovery rates. After 2 h incubation, expression of PrP or Dpl was altered only in PMNs. These cells overexpressed PrP when incubated with TNFalpha and IFNgamma, and both PrP and Dpl when incubated with C5a; incubation with TNFalpha, IL-8 and IFNgamma led to down-regulation of Dpl. Lymphocytes incubated for 18 h with IL-2 and with IFNgamma overexpressed Dpl. Incubation with the anti-PrP antibody induced down-regulation of Dpl in PMNs after 2 h and overexpression of Dpl in lymphocytes after 18 h. The differences recorded after 2 h were likely due to redistribution of pre-existing PrP or Dpl molecules, while those seen at 18 h were most probably due to increased protein synthesis. The variations seen using the different activators depend on different receptors and/or signaling pathways. These results demonstrate that is possible to alter the expression of Dpl and PrP in blood cells in vitro by incubation with either cytokines or anti-PrP antibodies. This opens an interesting opportunity to study the biology of these proteins using in vitro systems.
据推测,多普蛋白(Dpl)和朊病毒蛋白(PrP)之间存在尚未确定的相互作用,因为Dpl在转基因PrP缺陷小鼠中过度表达。在本研究中,我们通过流式细胞术研究了从牛血中分离出的淋巴细胞、单核细胞和中性粒细胞(PMN)上Dpl和PrP的表达水平,并将其与肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)、白细胞介素-1(IL-1)、白细胞介素-2(IL-2)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、C5a、干扰素γ(IFNγ)、抗PrP抗体和抗Dpl抗体一起孵育(2小时和18小时)。分离程序产生了具有高纯度、活力和回收率的细胞群体。孵育2小时后,仅PMN中PrP或Dpl的表达发生改变。这些细胞在与TNFα和IFNγ孵育时PrP过度表达,在与C5a孵育时PrP和Dpl均过度表达;与TNFα、IL-8和IFNγ孵育导致Dpl下调。与IL-2和IFNγ孵育18小时的淋巴细胞Dpl过度表达。与抗PrP抗体孵育2小时后,PMN中Dpl下调,18小时后淋巴细胞中Dpl过度表达。2小时后记录的差异可能是由于预先存在的PrP或Dpl分子的重新分布,而18小时时观察到的差异很可能是由于蛋白质合成增加。使用不同激活剂观察到的变化取决于不同的受体和/或信号通路。这些结果表明,通过与细胞因子或抗PrP抗体孵育,有可能在体外改变血细胞中Dpl和PrP的表达。这为使用体外系统研究这些蛋白质的生物学特性提供了一个有趣的机会。