Fukui Hiroki, Murai Toshiya, Shinozaki Jun, Aso Toshihiko, Fukuyama Hidenao, Hayashi Takuji, Hanakawa Takashi
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Shogoin-Kawaharacho 54, Kyoto 606, Japan.
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):913-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.039. Epub 2006 May 6.
One of the most powerful ways of succeeding in complex social interactions is to read the minds of companions and stay a step ahead of them. In order to assess neural responses to reciprocal mind reading in socially strained human relationships, we used a 3-T scanner to perform an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study in 16 healthy subjects who participated in the game of Chicken. Statistical parametric mapping showed that the counterpart effect (human minus computer) exclusively activated the medial frontal area corresponding to the anterior paracingulate cortex (PCC) and the supramarginal gyrus neighboring the posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS). Furthermore, when we analyzed the data to evaluate whether the subjects made risky/aggressive or safe/reconciliatory choices, the posterior STS showed that the counterpart had a reliable effect regardless of risky or safe decisions. In contrast, a significant opponent x selection interaction was revealed in the anterior PCC. Based on our findings, it could be inferred that the posterior STS and the anterior PCC play differential roles in mentalizing; the former serves as a general mechanism for mentalizing, while the latter is exclusively involved in socially risky decisions.
在复杂的社交互动中取得成功的最有效方法之一是读懂同伴的心思并领先他们一步。为了评估在人际关系紧张的情况下对相互心智解读的神经反应,我们使用3-T扫描仪对16名参与斗鸡游戏的健康受试者进行了一项事件相关功能磁共振成像研究。统计参数映射显示,对手效应(人类减去计算机)专门激活了与前扣带旁皮质(PCC)相对应的内侧额叶区域以及与后颞上沟(STS)相邻的缘上回。此外,当我们分析数据以评估受试者是做出冒险/激进还是安全/和解选择时,后STS显示,无论做出冒险还是安全决策,对手都有可靠的影响。相比之下,在前PCC中发现了显著的对手×选择交互作用。根据我们的研究结果,可以推断后STS和前PCC在心理理论中发挥不同的作用;前者作为心理理论的一般机制,而后者专门参与社会风险决策。