Li Siying, Huang Yulong, Xu Cheng, Wu Jie, Qu Chen
Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China.
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;14(8):721. doi: 10.3390/bs14080721.
The constant challenge in social interactions involves making informed decisions in the face of competitive and cooperative dilemmas. The decision-making process can be influenced by various factors present in the social context. According to the behavior-pattern-categorization framework of information acquisition, potential biases may develop at all stages of decision-making as information about social context is progressively entered and integrated. In this study, employing the Chicken Game, we investigated the influence of varying information levels within the behavior-pattern-categorization framework (i.e., competitiveness of behavior choice, uncertainty of behavior pattern, and sociality of category) on decision-making in the dilemma of competition and cooperation. Combined with reinforcement learning models, our findings from three experiments showed that participants exhibited basic complementary behavior, becoming less competitive against highly competitive opponents and vice versa. Notably, individuals exhibited varying adaptation rates to different levels of opponent competitiveness and fluctuations. Specifically, participants adapted slower to highly competitive opponents and faster to cooperative opponents. This asymmetric adaptation in social learning is related to the rate at which various levels of information are updated. The current study disentangles the different levels of information acquisition and highlights the asymmetric processing that can occur during the updating of information within each level.
社交互动中的持续挑战在于,在面对竞争与合作的两难困境时做出明智的决策。决策过程可能会受到社会背景中各种因素的影响。根据信息获取的行为模式分类框架,随着关于社会背景的信息逐步输入和整合,决策的各个阶段都可能产生潜在的偏差。在本研究中,我们采用斗鸡博弈,在行为模式分类框架内(即行为选择的竞争性、行为模式的不确定性和类别社会性)研究了不同信息水平对竞争与合作两难情境中决策的影响。结合强化学习模型,我们三个实验的结果表明,参与者表现出基本的互补行为,面对高度竞争的对手时竞争力降低,反之亦然。值得注意的是,个体对不同水平的对手竞争力和波动表现出不同的适应率。具体而言,参与者对高度竞争的对手适应较慢,对合作的对手适应较快。这种社会学习中的不对称适应与不同水平信息的更新速率有关。当前的研究厘清了不同水平的信息获取,并突出了在每个水平的信息更新过程中可能发生的不对称处理。