Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
JARA - Translational Brain Medicine, Aachen, Germany.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Aug 1;45(11):e26788. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26788.
In traditional game theory tasks, social decision-making is centered on the prediction of the intentions (i.e., mentalizing) of strangers or manipulated responses. In contrast, real-life scenarios often involve familiar individuals in dynamic environments. Further research is needed to explore neural correlates of social decision-making with changes in the available information and environmental settings. This study collected fMRI hyperscanning data (N = 100, 46 same-sex pairs were analyzed) to investigate sibling pairs engaging in an iterated Chicken Game task within a competitive context, including two decision-making phases. In the static phase, participants chose between turning (cooperate) and continuing (defect) in a fixed time window. Participants could estimate the probability of different events based on their priors (previous outcomes and representation of other's intentions) and report their decision plan. The dynamic phase mirrored real-world interactions in which information is continuously changing (replicated within a virtual environment). Individuals had to simultaneously update their beliefs, monitor the actions of the other, and adjust their decisions. Our findings revealed substantial choice consistency between the two phases and evidence for shared neural correlates in mentalizing-related brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction (TPJ), and precuneus. Specific neural correlates were associated with each phase; increased activation of areas associated with action planning and outcome evaluation were found in the static compared with the dynamic phase. Using the opposite contrast, dynamic decision-making showed higher activation in regions related to predicting and monitoring other's actions, including the anterior cingulate cortex and insula. Cooperation (turning), compared with defection (continuing), showed increased activation in mentalizing-related regions only in the static phase, while defection, relative to cooperation, exhibited higher activation in areas associated with conflict monitoring and risk processing in the dynamic phase. Men were less cooperative and had greater TPJ activation. Sibling competitive relationship did not predict competitive behavior but showed a tendency to predict brain activity during dynamic decision-making. Only individual brain activation results are included here, and no interbrain analyses are reported. These neural correlates emphasize the significance of considering varying levels of information available and environmental settings when delving into the intricacies of mentalizing during social decision-making among familiar individuals.
在传统的博弈论任务中,社会决策侧重于预测陌生人的意图(即心理理论)或操纵反应。相比之下,现实生活中的场景通常涉及熟悉的个体在动态环境中。需要进一步研究来探索随着可用信息和环境设置的变化,社会决策的神经相关性。本研究收集了 fMRI 超扫描数据(N=100,分析了 46 对同性双胞胎),以研究在竞争环境中进行迭代博弈游戏任务的兄弟姐妹对,其中包括两个决策阶段。在静态阶段,参与者在固定的时间窗口内选择转向(合作)或继续(违约)。参与者可以根据先验(以前的结果和他人意图的表示)来估计不同事件的概率,并报告他们的决策计划。动态阶段反映了现实世界的互动,其中信息在不断变化(在虚拟环境中复制)。个人必须同时更新他们的信念,监控对方的行为,并调整他们的决策。我们的研究结果表明,在两个阶段之间存在大量的选择一致性,并且在心理理论相关脑区存在共享的神经相关性的证据,包括前额叶皮层、颞顶联合区(TPJ)和楔前叶。特定的神经相关性与每个阶段相关联;与动态阶段相比,在静态阶段发现与动作规划和结果评估相关的区域的激活增加。使用相反的对比,动态决策在与预测和监控他人动作相关的区域显示出更高的激活,包括前扣带皮层和脑岛。与违约(继续)相比,合作(转向)仅在静态阶段显示出与心理理论相关区域的激活增加,而在动态阶段,违约相对于合作显示出与冲突监测和风险处理相关区域的更高激活。男性合作意愿较低,TPJ 激活度较高。兄弟姐妹的竞争关系并不能预测竞争行为,但在动态决策中表现出对大脑活动的预测倾向。这里只包括个体大脑激活结果,没有报告脑间分析。这些神经相关性强调了在熟悉的个体之间进行社会决策时,考虑到可用信息的不同水平和环境设置的重要性。