Smith Thomas J, Khatcheressian James, Lyman Gary H, Ozer Howard, Armitage James O, Balducci Lodovico, Bennett Charles L, Cantor Scott B, Crawford Jeffrey, Cross Scott J, Demetri George, Desch Christopher E, Pizzo Philip A, Schiffer Charles A, Schwartzberg Lee, Somerfield Mark R, Somlo George, Wade James C, Wade James L, Winn Rodger J, Wozniak Antoinette J, Wolff Antonio C
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Policy and Clinical Affairs, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3187-205. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.4451. Epub 2006 May 8.
To update the 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF).
The Update Committee completed a review and analysis of pertinent data published from 1999 through September 2005. Guided by the 1996 ASCO clinical outcomes criteria, the Update Committee formulated recommendations based on improvements in survival, quality of life, toxicity reduction and cost-effectiveness.
The 2005 Update Committee agreed unanimously that reduction in febrile neutropenia (FN) is an important clinical outcome that justifies the use of CSFs, regardless of impact on other factors, when the risk of FN is approximately 20% and no other equally effective regimen that does not require CSFs is available. Primary prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of FN in patients who are at high risk based on age, medical history, disease characteristics, and myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen. CSF use allows a modest to moderate increase in dose-density and/or dose-intensity of chemotherapy regimens. Dose-dense regimens should only be used within an appropriately designed clinical trial or if supported by convincing efficacy data. Prophylactic CSF for patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma aged 65 years and older treated with curative chemotherapy (CHOP or more aggressive regimens) should be given to reduce the incidence of FN and infections. Current recommendations for the management of patients exposed to lethal doses of total body radiotherapy, but not doses high enough to lead to certain death due to injury to other organs, includes the prompt administration of CSF or pegylated G-CSF.
更新2000年美国临床肿瘤学会关于造血集落刺激因子(CSF)使用的指南。
更新委员会对1999年至2005年9月发表的相关数据进行了回顾和分析。在1996年美国临床肿瘤学会临床结果标准的指导下,更新委员会基于生存改善、生活质量、毒性降低和成本效益制定了建议。
2005年更新委员会一致认为,当发热性中性粒细胞减少(FN)风险约为20%且没有其他同样有效的非CSF方案可用时,降低FN是一个重要的临床结果,证明使用CSF是合理的,无论对其他因素的影响如何。对于基于年龄、病史、疾病特征和化疗方案的骨髓毒性处于高风险的患者,建议进行一级预防以预防FN。使用CSF可使化疗方案的剂量密度和/或剂量强度适度至中度增加。剂量密集方案仅应在适当设计的临床试验中使用,或有令人信服的疗效数据支持时使用。对于接受根治性化疗(CHOP或更积极方案)的65岁及以上弥漫性侵袭性淋巴瘤患者,应给予预防性CSF以降低FN和感染的发生率。目前对于暴露于致死剂量全身放疗但剂量不足以因其他器官损伤导致必然死亡的患者的管理建议包括及时给予CSF或聚乙二醇化G-CSF。