Krouse Robert S, Mohler M Jane, Wendel Christopher S, Grant Marcia, Baldwin Carol M, Rawl Susan M, McCorkle Ruth, Rosenfeld Kenneth E, Ko Clifford Y, Schmidt C Max, Coons Stephen Joel
Southern Arizona Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Tucson, AZ 85723, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Apr;22(4):781-91. doi: 10.1185/030079906X96380.
To present the design and methods of a multisite study of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) in veterans living with ostomies.
Veterans from Tucson, Indianapolis, and Los Angeles VA Medical Centers were surveyed using the validated City of Hope ostomy-specific tool (mCOH-QOL-Ostomy) and the SF-36V. Cases (ostomates) had a major gastrointestinal procedure that required an intestinal stoma, while controls had similar procedures for which an ostomy was not required. Ostomy subjects were recruited for four focus groups in each of two sites divided by ostomy type (colostomy versus ileostomy) and overall mCOH-QOL-Ostomy HR-QOL score (highest versus lowest quartile). The focus groups further evaluated barriers, concerns, and adaptation methods and skills.
This report presents recruitment results, reliability of survey instruments, and demographic characteristics of the sample.
The overall response (i.e., recruitment) rate across all sites was 48% and by site was 53%, 57%, and 37%, respectively (p < 0.001). Internal consistency reliability estimates indicated that both instruments remain reliable in this population (Cronbach's alpha for HR-QOL domains/scales: 0.71-0.96). Cases and controls were similar in demographic characteristics. Proportions of minority subjects matched projections from the site patient populations. Subjects with ostomies had significantly longer time since surgery than controls (p < 0.001). Focus groups were comprised of two to six subjects per group and demonstrated racial diversity at the Los Angeles site.
The unique design of our study of VA patients with ostomies is an illustration of a successful mixed methods approach to HR-QOL research. We collected meaningful quantitative and qualitative data that will be used in the development of new approaches to care that will lead to improved functioning and well-being in persons living with ostomies. Subsequent reports will provide the results of this research project.
介绍一项针对造口退伍军人健康相关生活质量(HR-QOL)的多中心研究的设计和方法。
对来自图森、印第安纳波利斯和洛杉矶退伍军人医疗中心的退伍军人使用经过验证的希望之城特定造口工具(mCOH-QOL-Ostomy)和SF-36V进行调查。病例(造口者)接受了需要肠道造口的重大胃肠道手术,而对照组接受了不需要造口的类似手术。根据造口类型(结肠造口术与回肠造口术)和mCOH-QOL-Ostomy总体HR-QOL评分(最高四分位数与最低四分位数),在两个地点分别为造口受试者招募了四个焦点小组。焦点小组进一步评估了障碍、担忧以及适应方法和技能。
本报告介绍了招募结果、调查工具的可靠性以及样本的人口统计学特征。
所有地点的总体应答(即招募)率为48%,各地点分别为53%、57%和37%(p<0.001)。内部一致性可靠性估计表明,这两种工具在该人群中仍然可靠(HR-QOL领域/量表的Cronbach's α系数:0.71-0.96)。病例组和对照组在人口统计学特征方面相似。少数族裔受试者的比例与各地点患者人群的预测相符。造口受试者术后时间显著长于对照组(p<0.001)。焦点小组每组由2至6名受试者组成,洛杉矶地点的小组展示了种族多样性。
我们对退伍军人造口患者的研究采用的独特设计,例证了一种成功的混合方法用于HR-QOL研究。我们收集了有意义的定量和定性数据,这些数据将用于开发新的护理方法,以改善造口者的功能和健康状况。后续报告将提供该研究项目的结果。