Ohtsuka Yukihiro, Kawakami Satoru, Fujii Yasuhisa, Koga Fumitaka, Saito Kazutaka, Ando Noboru, Takizawa Touichiro, Kageyama Yukio, Kihara Kazunori
Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1322-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06158.x.
To investigate the association between the expression of uroplakin III (UPIII) and the prognosis of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract, as uroplakins are urothelium-specific markers of terminal urothelial differentiation.
Clinicopathological and follow-up data from 71 patients who had undergone radical nephroureterectomy and lymph node dissection or sampling for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract were reviewed. The expression of UPIII was evaluated immunohistochemically in surgical specimens. Cancer-specific survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier plots. Prognostic values of clinicopathological variables including UPIII expression status, tumour stage and grade were evaluated by univariate analyses, followed by multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional-hazard model.
In all specimens there was intense UPIII immunoreactivity of umbrella cells of normal urothelium. In tumour samples, UPIII expression was positive in 75% of < or = pT1 tumours and 40% of > or = pT2 (P = 0.02), and in 65% of grade 1-2 tumours and 33% of grade 3 (P = 0.009). Of the 71 patients, 21 died from the disease during the median follow-up of 61 months. The cancer-specific survival of patients with negative UPIII expression was significantly worse than that of those with positive UPIII expression (5-year cancer-specific survival, 100% vs 46%, P < 0.001). Neither patient age at diagnosis, histological grade, sex, or multiplicity of the tumour had significant prognostic value. Multivariate analysis revealed that UPIII expression was the most powerful prognostic indicator (P < 0.001) followed by tumour stage (P = 0.04) and lymph node metastasis (P = 0.05).
The present data suggest that UPIII expression is a powerful prognostic factor in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
尿血小板溶素是尿路上皮终末分化的特异性标志物,本研究旨在探讨尿血小板溶素III(UPIII)的表达与上尿路尿路上皮癌患者预后之间的关系。
回顾性分析71例行根治性肾输尿管切除术及淋巴结清扫或取材术的上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的临床病理及随访资料。采用免疫组织化学方法评估手术标本中UPIII的表达。使用Kaplan-Meier法计算癌症特异性生存率。通过单因素分析评估包括UPIII表达状态、肿瘤分期和分级在内的临床病理变量的预后价值,随后使用Cox比例风险模型进行多因素分析。
在所有标本中,正常尿路上皮伞细胞均有强烈的UPIII免疫反应性。在肿瘤样本中,75%的≤pT1肿瘤和40%的≥pT2肿瘤UPIII表达呈阳性(P = 0.02),65%的1-2级肿瘤和33%的3级肿瘤UPIII表达呈阳性(P = 0.009)。71例患者中,21例在中位随访61个月期间死于该疾病。UPIII表达阴性患者的癌症特异性生存率显著低于UPIII表达阳性患者(5年癌症特异性生存率,100%对46%,P < 0.001)。患者的诊断年龄、组织学分级、性别或肿瘤的多灶性均无显著的预后价值。多因素分析显示,UPIII表达是最有力的预后指标(P < 0.001),其次是肿瘤分期(P = 0.04)和淋巴结转移(P = 0.05)。
目前的数据表明,UPIII表达是上尿路尿路上皮癌患者的有力预后因素。