Suppr超能文献

社会时差:生物时间与社会时间的不同步。

Social jetlag: misalignment of biological and social time.

作者信息

Wittmann Marc, Dinich Jenny, Merrow Martha, Roenneberg Till

机构信息

Generation Research Program, Human Science Center, Ludwig-Maximilian University Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(1-2):497-509. doi: 10.1080/07420520500545979.

Abstract

Humans show large differences in the preferred timing of their sleep and activity. This so-called "chronotype" is largely regulated by the circadian clock. Both genetic variations in clock genes and environmental influences contribute to the distribution of chronotypes in a given population, ranging from extreme early types to extreme late types with the majority falling between these extremes. Social (e.g., school and work) schedules interfere considerably with individual sleep preferences in the majority of the population. Late chronotypes show the largest differences in sleep timing between work and free days leading to a considerable sleep debt on work days, for which they compensate on free days. The discrepancy between work and free days, between social and biological time, can be described as 'social jetlag.' Here, we explore how sleep quality and psychological wellbeing are associated with individual chronotype and/or social jetlag. A total of 501 volunteers filled out the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) as well as additional questionnaires on: (i) sleep quality (SF-A), (ii) current psychological wellbeing (Basler Befindlichkeitsbogen), (iii) retrospective psychological wellbeing over the past week (POMS), and (iv) consumption of stimulants (e.g., caffeine, nicotine, and alcohol). Associations of chronotype, wellbeing, and stimulant consumption are strongest in teenagers and young adults up to age 25 yrs. The most striking correlation exists between chronotype and smoking, which is significantly higher in late chronotypes of all ages (except for those in retirement). We show these correlations are most probably a consequence of social jetlag, i.e., the discrepancies between social and biological timing rather than a simple association to different chronotypes. Our results strongly suggest that work (and school) schedules should be adapted to chronotype whenever possible.

摘要

人类在睡眠和活动的偏好时间上存在很大差异。这种所谓的“昼夜节律类型”在很大程度上受生物钟调节。生物钟基因的遗传变异和环境影响都对特定人群中昼夜节律类型的分布有贡献,范围从极端早起型到极端晚睡型,大多数人处于这两个极端之间。社会(如学校和工作)时间表在大多数人群中极大地干扰了个人的睡眠偏好。晚睡型在工作日和休息日的睡眠时间差异最大,导致工作日有相当大的睡眠债,他们会在休息日进行补偿。工作日和休息日之间、社会时间和生物时间之间的差异可被描述为“社会时差”。在这里,我们探讨睡眠质量和心理健康如何与个体的昼夜节律类型和/或社会时差相关联。共有501名志愿者填写了慕尼黑昼夜节律类型问卷(MCTQ)以及关于以下方面 的其他问卷:(i)睡眠质量(SF-A),(ii)当前心理健康状况(巴塞尔情绪问卷),(iii)过去一周的回顾性心理健康状况(POMS),以及(iv)兴奋剂(如咖啡因、尼古丁和酒精)的摄入量。昼夜节律类型、心理健康和兴奋剂消费之间的关联在青少年和25岁以下的年轻人中最为强烈。昼夜节律类型与吸烟之间存在最显著的相关性,在所有年龄段的晚睡型中(退休人员除外),吸烟率明显更高。我们表明,这些相关性很可能是社会时差的结果,即社会时间和生物时间之间的差异,而不是与不同昼夜节律类型的简单关联。我们的结果强烈表明,工作(和学校)时间表应尽可能适应昼夜节律类型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验