• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[The end of cognition? Science and technology studies challenge the concept of the cognising agent].

作者信息

Woolgar S

机构信息

Brunel University, London.

出版信息

Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 1995;2(3):105-33.

PMID:16688906
Abstract

The concept of 'cognition' is central to a wide literature in social science and philosophy where a key assumption conceptualises the central unit of analysis as a cognising agent. However, recent developments in Science and Technology Studies (STS) question this assumption and suggest the basis for its modification. The paper describes and evaluates these developments. It examines critiques for the "received view" of science and suggests that nothing less than a full scale analytic inversion is needed adequately to confront entrenched conceptions about cognition. It surveys progressive attempts to achieve symmetry in STS. It then considers three sets of key assumptions about agency: 1. what is the agent doing?; 2. what is the nature of the agent?; and 3. why should human agents have the monopoly on human attributes?

摘要

相似文献

1
[The end of cognition? Science and technology studies challenge the concept of the cognising agent].
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 1995;2(3):105-33.
2
[The southern Sisyphus: the social sciences in Argentina].
Quipu. 1990;7(2):149-85.
3
Science as social and political reform. Monists and Nazis: a question of scientific responsibility.作为社会与政治改革的科学。一元论者与纳粹:科学责任问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1975 Apr;5(2):37-43.
4
Evolutionary epistemology as a philosophy of nature. "What can we know?" By Gerhard Vollmer. Essay review.作为一种自然哲学的进化认识论。《我们能知道什么?》,作者格哈德·福尔默。论文综述。
Hist Philos Life Sci. 1987;9(2):339-46.
5
From natural science to social science.从自然科学到社会科学。
Psychoanal Rev. 1967 Spring;54(1):175-6.
6
[Science and ideology in studies on human growth in France and Spain (1900-1950)].[法国和西班牙关于人类成长的研究中的科学与意识形态(1900 - 1950)]
Dynamis. 2003;23:61-84.
7
[Controlling science and technology, 1965-2000].[控制科学与技术,1965 - 2000年]
Gewina. 2000;23(3):214-27.
8
Man in the age of technology.科技时代的人类。
J Anal Psychol. 2009 Feb;54(1):3-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.01753.x.
9
NEWS AND NOTES-WINTER 2016.
J Hist Behav Sci. 2016 Winter;52(1):91-2. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.21772.
10
We cannot live by scepticism alone.我们不能仅靠怀疑论来生活。
Nature. 2009 Mar 5;458(7234):30. doi: 10.1038/458030a.