Improving the quality and clinical relevance of diagnostic studies.
作者信息
Rutten Frans H, Moons Karel G M, Hoes Arno W
机构信息
Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, 3508 AB, Netherlands.
出版信息
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1129.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Improving the quality and clinical relevance of diagnostic studies.提高诊断研究的质量和临床相关性。
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1129.
2
Assessing sensitivity and specificity in new diagnostic tests: the importance and challenges of study populations.评估新型诊断测试的敏感性和特异性：研究人群的重要性与挑战。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;33(11):1177-8. doi: 10.1086/668036.
3
Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey.诊断准确性研究的样本量：文献调查。
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1127-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38793.637789.2F. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
4
Sample size for diagnostic accuracy studies.诊断准确性研究的样本量
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;57(8):869-70; author reply 871-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.008.
5
Three principles to define the success of a diagnostic study could be identified.可以确定三项原则来定义诊断研究的成功。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
6
[Evaluation of diagnostic methods].[诊断方法的评估]
J Radiol. 2001 Feb;82(2):117-25.
7
Modified exact sample size for a binomial proportion with special emphasis on diagnostic test parameter estimation.针对二项比例的修正精确样本量，特别强调诊断试验参数估计。
Stat Med. 2005 Sep 30;24(18):2857-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.2146.
8
On sample size for sensitivity and specificity in prospective diagnostic accuracy studies.前瞻性诊断准确性研究中敏感性和特异性的样本量问题
Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30;23(16):2537-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.1836.
9
Small sample estimation of relative accuracy for binary screening tests.二元筛查试验相对准确性的小样本估计
Stat Med. 2004 Jan 15;23(1):21-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.1598.
10
Simple nomograms to calculate sample size in diagnostic studies.用于计算诊断研究样本量的简易列线图。
Emerg Med J. 2005 Mar;22(3):180-1. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.011148.
引用本文的文献
1
Sample size determination for point-of-care COVID-19 diagnostic tests: a Bayesian approach.即时检测2019冠状病毒病诊断测试的样本量确定：一种贝叶斯方法。
Diagn Progn Res. 2023 Aug 18;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41512-023-00153-1.
本文引用的文献
1
Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey.诊断准确性研究的样本量：文献调查。
BMJ. 2006 May 13;332(7550):1127-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38793.637789.2F. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
2
Recognising heart failure in elderly patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: cross sectional diagnostic study.在基层医疗中识别患有稳定型慢性阻塞性肺疾病的老年患者的心衰：横断面诊断研究
BMJ. 2005 Dec 10;331(7529):1379. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38664.661181.55. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
3
Test research versus diagnostic research.试验研究与诊断研究
Clin Chem. 2004 Mar;50(3):473-6. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.024752.
4
Sensitivity and specificity should be de-emphasized in diagnostic accuracy studies.在诊断准确性研究中，应弱化敏感度和特异度的重要性。
Acad Radiol. 2003 Jun;10(6):670-2. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80087-9.
5
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.逻辑回归分析中每个变量事件数的模拟研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Dec;49(12):1373-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3.
Zotero 插件