Avendano Mauricio, Kawachi Ichiro, Van Lenthe Frank, Boshuizen Hendriek C, Mackenbach Johan P, Van den Bos G A M, Fay Martha E, Berkman Lisa F
Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1368-73. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221702.75002.66. Epub 2006 May 11.
This study assesses the effect of socioeconomic status on stroke incidence in the elderly, and the contribution of risk factors to stroke disparities.
Data comprised a sample of 2812 men and women aged 65 years and over from the New Haven cohort of the Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly. Individuals provided baseline information on demographics, functioning, cardiovascular and psychosocial risk factors in 1982 and were followed for 12 years. Proportional hazard models were used to model survival from initial interview to first fatal or nonfatal stroke.
Two hundred and seventy subjects developed incident stroke. At ages 65 to 74, lower socioeconomic status was associated with higher stroke incidence for both education (HR(lowest/highest)=2.07, 95% CI, 1.04 to 4.13) and income (HR(lowest/highest)=2.08, 95% CI, 1.01 to 4.27). Adjustment for race, diabetes, depression, social networks and functioning attenuated hazard ratios to a nonsignificant level, whereas other risk factors did not change associations significantly. Beyond age 75, however, stroke rates were higher among those with the highest education (HR(lowest/highest)=0.42, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.79) and income (HR(lowest/highest)=0.43, 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86), which remained largely unchanged after adjustment for risk factors.
We observed substantial socioeconomic disparities in stroke at ages 65 to 74, whereas a crossover of the association occurred beyond age 75. Policies to improve social and economic resources at early old age, and interventions to improve diabetes management, depression, social networks and functioning in the disadvantaged elderly can contribute to reduce stroke disparities.
本研究评估社会经济地位对老年人中风发病率的影响,以及危险因素对中风差异的作用。
数据来自老年流行病学研究既定人群纽黑文队列中2812名65岁及以上的男性和女性样本。个体在1982年提供了关于人口统计学、功能、心血管和心理社会危险因素的基线信息,并随访12年。使用比例风险模型对从初次访谈至首次致命或非致命中风的生存情况进行建模。
270名受试者发生了中风。在65至74岁年龄段,社会经济地位较低与中风发病率较高相关,在教育程度方面(风险比(最低/最高)=2.07,95%可信区间,1.04至4.13)和收入方面(风险比(最低/最高)=2.08,95%可信区间,1.01至4.27)均如此。对种族、糖尿病、抑郁症、社交网络和功能进行调整后,风险比降至无显著意义的水平,而其他危险因素并未显著改变关联。然而,在75岁以上人群中,教育程度最高(风险比(最低/最高)=0.42,95%可信区间,0.22至0.79)和收入最高(风险比(最低/最高)=0.43,95%可信区间,0.22至0.86)者的中风发生率较高,在对危险因素进行调整后,这一情况基本未变。
我们观察到65至74岁年龄段中风存在显著的社会经济差异,而75岁以上人群中这种关联出现了交叉。改善老年早期社会和经济资源的政策,以及改善弱势老年人糖尿病管理、抑郁症、社交网络和功能的干预措施,有助于减少中风差异。