• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在基层眼科诊所环境中,HRT II与GDx成像用于青光眼检测的比较。

A comparison of HRT II and GDx imaging for glaucoma detection in a primary care eye clinic setting.

作者信息

Andreou P A, Wickremasinghe S S, Asaria R H, Tay E, Franks W A

机构信息

Glaucoma Service, Moorfield's Eye Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2007 Aug;21(8):1050-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702394. Epub 2006 May 12.

DOI:10.1038/sj.eye.6702394
PMID:16691256
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of the HRT II (Heidelberg retinal tomograph) and GDx (glaucoma detection) retinal nerve fibre analyzer in GDx when used in the primary care eye clinic setting for glaucoma screening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was prospective, cross-sectional, and hospital-based. One-hundred and twelve patients, 59 women and 53 men with a mean age of 57.8 years (range 18-85 years), had consecutive HRT II disc imaging and GDx retinal nerve fiber layer analysis. The Moorfield's regression classification and the 'GDx number' were used to predict the likelihood of glaucoma. A separate clinician, masked to the instrument results determined a definitive diagnosis, based on clinical examination. The extent of agreement between instrument prediction and the clinician diagnosis of glaucoma was examined by generating sensitivity and specificity tables.

RESULTS

The HRT II had a sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.60-0.92) and a specificity of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60-0.78). The positive predictive value of the HRT II was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.29-0.57). Using a GDx number of 50 as 'cutoff' for glaucoma detection, the GDx had a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.59-0.93) and a specificity of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.61-0.80), with a positive predictive value of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.28-0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

For glaucoma detection, neither the HRT II nor the GDx are effective as stand-alone screening devices in the primary care setting.

摘要

目的

评估在基层眼科诊所环境中用于青光眼筛查时,HRT II(海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪)和GDx(青光眼检测仪)视网膜神经纤维分析仪的性能。

患者与方法

本研究为前瞻性、横断面、基于医院的研究。112例患者,其中59名女性和53名男性,平均年龄57.8岁(范围18 - 85岁),连续接受了HRT II视盘成像和GDx视网膜神经纤维层分析。使用穆尔菲尔德回归分类法和“GDx数值”来预测青光眼的可能性。另一位对仪器结果不知情的临床医生根据临床检查确定最终诊断。通过生成敏感度和特异度表来检查仪器预测与临床医生对青光眼诊断之间的一致性程度。

结果

HRT II的敏感度为0.79(95%可信区间:0.60 - 0.92),特异度为0.70(95%可信区间:0.60 - 0.78)。HRT II的阳性预测值为0.43(95%可信区间:0.29 - 0.57)。以GDx数值50作为青光眼检测的“临界值”时,GDx的敏感度为0.80(95%可信区间:0.59 - 0.93),特异度为0.72(95%可信区间:0.61 - 0.80),阳性预测值为0.43(95%可信区间:0.28 - 0.59)。

结论

对于青光眼检测,在基层医疗环境中,HRT II和GDx作为单独的筛查设备均无效。

相似文献

1
A comparison of HRT II and GDx imaging for glaucoma detection in a primary care eye clinic setting.在基层眼科诊所环境中,HRT II与GDx成像用于青光眼检测的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2007 Aug;21(8):1050-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702394. Epub 2006 May 12.
2
[Agreement between clinical evaluation, Heidelberg-Retina-Tomograph (HRT) and Nerve Fiber Analyzer (GDx) in glaucoma diagnosis].
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Sep;221(9):757-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813555.
3
[Glaucoma-screening with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II].[使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪II进行青光眼筛查]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2003 Aug;220(8):540-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41876.
4
Validity of screening for glaucomatous optic nerve damage using confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II) in high-risk populations: a pilot study.使用共焦扫描激光检眼镜(海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪II型)对高危人群进行青光眼性视神经损伤筛查的有效性:一项初步研究。
Ophthalmology. 2005 Dec;112(12):2164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.09.009.
5
Accuracy of scanning laser polarimetry, scanning laser tomography, and their combination in a glaucoma screening trial.扫描激光偏振仪、扫描激光断层扫描及其联合应用在青光眼筛查试验中的准确性。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Dec;17(8):639-46. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318168f01a.
6
Accuracy of combined GDx-VCC and matrix FDT in a glaucoma screening trial.青光眼筛查试验中GDx-VCC与矩阵FDT联合检测的准确性
J Glaucoma. 2007 Aug;16(5):462-70. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180316754.
7
[Glaucoma diagnosis with the GDx and measurement of nerve fibre thickness (RTA)].[使用GDx进行青光眼诊断及神经纤维厚度测量(视网膜厚度分析仪)]
Ophthalmologe. 2003 Jan;100(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s00347-002-0753-3.
8
Preperimetric glaucoma assessment with scanning laser polarimetry (GDx VCC): analysis of retinal nerve fiber layer by sectors.使用扫描激光偏振仪(GDx VCC)进行青光眼视野检查前评估:按象限分析视网膜神经纤维层
J Glaucoma. 2007 Dec;16(8):659-64. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318093e5bf.
9
Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph (HRT 2) parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle closure glaucoma: a comparative study in an Indian population.原发性开角型青光眼和原发性闭角型青光眼的海德堡视网膜断层扫描(HRT 2)参数:印度人群的一项比较研究。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;13(5):343-50. doi: 10.1080/09286580600850983.
10
Automated analysis of heidelberg retina tomograph optic disc images by glaucoma probability score.通过青光眼概率评分对海德堡视网膜断层扫描视盘图像进行自动分析。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5348-55. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0579.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of advancements in machine learning for glaucoma: current trends and future direction.青光眼机器学习进展的范围综述:当前趋势与未来方向
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 24;12:1573329. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1573329. eCollection 2025.
2
Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging in Glaucoma.青光眼的黄斑光学相干断层扫描成像
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2021 Jul 29;16(3):478-489. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9442. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
3
Macular imaging with optical coherence tomography in glaucoma.光学相干断层扫描在青光眼中的黄斑成像。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov-Dec;65(6):597-638. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
4
Glaucoma-induced optic disc morphometric changes and glaucoma diagnostic ability of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II in highly myopic eyes.高度近视眼中海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪 II 测量视盘形态变化与青光眼诊断能力的相关性研究
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):e86417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086417. eCollection 2014.