Bianchi R, Aspillaga C, Pizarro D, Escobar D, Alvarado C L, Yáñez V, Poblete N
Servicio de Obstetricia, Ginecología y Neonatología, Hospital Clínico San Borja-Arriarán, Chile.
Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1991;56(6):420-7.
Using a national curve of fetal growth development, clinical and laboratory characteristics of 100 term neonates small for dates and 130 term adequate for gestational age newborns are studied. A 91% of the small for dates were classified by the ponderal index as having symmetrical growth retardation. At the same time in the 230 mothers we look for clinical features that have been mentioned to produce intrauterine growth retardation. Results showed marked differences (with statistic significance) between both groups of women in relation to: nutritional factors, maternal height, labor activity and presence of oligoamnios. The newborns of both groups didn't show differences, with exception of congenital malformation. The incidence of the classical morbidity of small for dates (asphyxia, hypoglycemia, polycythemia) was no different in both groups. We believe the explanation is that the national curve is more exigent and neonates with higher weight fall under the 10th percentile. We think that in the study group a high percentage of small for dates, are constitutional small and not really growth retarded. We suggest the possibility to use the 5th percentile for better sensibility.
利用全国胎儿生长发育曲线,对100例足月小样儿和130例足月适于胎龄新生儿的临床及实验室特征进行了研究。91%的小样儿根据体重指数被分类为对称性生长受限。同时,我们在230名母亲中寻找曾被提及会导致宫内生长受限的临床特征。结果显示,两组女性在以下方面存在显著差异(具有统计学意义):营养因素、母亲身高、劳动活动及羊水过少情况。两组新生儿除先天性畸形外未显示出差异。小样儿的经典发病率(窒息、低血糖、红细胞增多症)在两组中并无不同。我们认为原因是全国曲线更为严格,体重较高的新生儿落在第10百分位数以下。我们认为在研究组中,高比例的小样儿是体质性矮小,而非真正的生长受限。我们建议使用第5百分位数以提高敏感性。