Bearden Carrie E, Freimer Nelson B
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Trends Genet. 2006 Jun;22(6):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2006.04.004. Epub 2006 May 11.
It is increasingly accepted that the imprecision of categorical psychiatric diagnoses can be a limiting factor in understanding the genetic basis of human behavioral abnormalities. Genetic investigation of endophenotypes--more precisely defined quantitative traits hypothesized to underlie disease syndromes--offers great promise as an alternative or complement to studies of categorical disease phenotypes. However, there is not yet standardization of the methods by which candidate endophenotypes should be chosen and applied. Fruitful endophenotype studies depend on the selection of heritable, quantitative traits that can be objectively and reliably measured. In this article, we propose guidelines for such investigations for psychiatric disorders, using endophenotypes previously proposed for bipolar disorder as particular examples. Gene expression studies and non-human primate models are recent developments in which an endophenotype approach might prove particularly valuable.
越来越多的人认识到,分类精神病诊断的不精确性可能是理解人类行为异常遗传基础的一个限制因素。对内表型(更精确地定义为假设构成疾病综合征基础的定量性状)的基因研究,作为对分类疾病表型研究的替代或补充,具有很大的前景。然而,选择和应用候选内表型的方法尚未标准化。富有成效的内表型研究依赖于选择可客观、可靠测量的可遗传定量性状。在本文中,我们以先前针对双相情感障碍提出的内表型为例,提出了针对精神疾病此类研究的指导方针。基因表达研究和非人类灵长类动物模型是内表型方法可能证明特别有价值的最新进展。