Suppr超能文献

右冠状动脉瓣脱垂并主动脉瓣反流合并流出道间隔室间隔缺损时的室间隔缺损封堵术:哪种治疗最为合适?

Ventricular septal defect closure in right coronary cusp prolapse and aortic regurgitation complicating VSD in the outlet septum: which treatment is most appropriate?

作者信息

Jian-Jun Ge, Xue-Gong Shi, Ru-Yuan Zhou, Min Lin, Sheng-Lin Ge, Shi-Bing Zhang, Qing-Yun Gao

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, 1st Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui 230022, China.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2006 Jun;15(3):168-71. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2005.10.006. Epub 2006 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is currently not a standardized technique for the sizing and shaping of surgical closure of the ventricular septal defect (VSD) patch in patients with right coronary aortic cusp prolapse and aortic regurgitation (AR) complicating VSD in the outlet septum.

METHODS

Forty-six VSD patients who had aortic valve prolapse were divided into groups DC (direct closure, n=19), and SPC (small patch closure, n=27). Preoperative and postoperative echocardiography with Doppler color flow interrogation was performed on all patients.

RESULTS

In the DC group, among seven patients who had aortic valve prolapse but no AR preoperative, one patient developed AR during postoperative follow-up period. In the remaining 12 patients who had mild AR associated with aortic valve prolapse prior to the procedure, AR was diminished in four and unchanged in six patients. However, AR was aggravated in two patients who required further operations for AV repair or replacement. In the SPC group, among the eight patients who had no preoperative AR, AR progressed in one patient postoperatively. In the remaining 19 patients who had mild AR, AR was diminished in 15 and unchanged in four. The outcome from the operative procedure was significantly better in the SPC group than DC group with mild preoperative AR (chi(2)=7.82; P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Small patch closure for this type of VSD is safer and more reliable in improving mild AR than that of direct closure, especially in patients with mild AR.

摘要

背景

目前对于合并右冠状动脉主动脉瓣叶脱垂及主动脉瓣反流(AR)的室间隔缺损(VSD)患者,在手术闭合VSD补片的尺寸确定和塑形方面尚无标准化技术。

方法

46例患有主动脉瓣脱垂的VSD患者被分为DC组(直接闭合,n = 19)和SPC组(小补片闭合,n = 27)。对所有患者进行术前和术后的超声心动图及多普勒彩色血流检查。

结果

在DC组中,术前有主动脉瓣脱垂但无AR的7例患者中,1例在术后随访期间出现AR。在术前合并轻度AR的其余12例患者中,4例患者的AR减轻,6例患者的AR无变化。然而,2例需要进一步手术进行主动脉瓣修复或置换的患者的AR加重。在SPC组中,术前无AR的8例患者中,1例术后AR进展。在其余19例患有轻度AR的患者中,15例患者的AR减轻,4例患者的AR无变化。术前轻度AR的患者中,SPC组的手术结果明显优于DC组(χ² = 7.82;P < 0.05)。

结论

对于此类VSD,小补片闭合在改善轻度AR方面比直接闭合更安全、更可靠,尤其是对于轻度AR患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验