Lannin Natasha, Scheinberg Adam, Clark Kathryn
Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney, Australia.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jun;48(6):533-9. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001125.
The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of therapy interventions on improving outcomes in children with cerebral palsy (CP) who have received botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injections to either upper or lower limb muscles. We searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials; the electronic databases Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, SCI, and SSCI; websites of professional associations; and reference lists in trial reports and other relevant articles. We used studies on the effect of therapy on motor control, functional abilities, contracture, spasticity, and/or pain as the selection criteria. Methodological quality and the strength of evidence was assessed systematically by three independent raters using American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine (AACPDM) guidelines. Twenty-four papers met the criteria for inclusion in the content analysis of evidence. Of these, only one randomized controlled trial was available, with results demonstrating that electrical stimulation postinjection did not enhance the effects of BTX-A on gait improvement (insufficient data provided to report size of effect). Remaining papers were of level II evidence (n=2), Level IV evidence (n=5), and level V evidence (n=14). We conclude that there is insufficient evidence to either support or refute the use of therapy interventions after BTX-A injections in children with CP.
本综述的目的是评估治疗干预措施对改善接受肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTX-A)注射上肢或下肢肌肉的脑瘫(CP)患儿预后的有效性。我们检索了:Cochrane对照试验中央注册库;电子数据库Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL、PEDro、SCI和SSCI;专业协会网站;以及试验报告和其他相关文章中的参考文献列表。我们将关于治疗对运动控制、功能能力、挛缩、痉挛和/或疼痛影响的研究作为选择标准。由三名独立评估者使用美国脑性瘫痪和发育医学学会(AACPDM)指南系统评估方法学质量和证据强度。24篇论文符合纳入证据内容分析的标准。其中,仅有一项随机对照试验,结果表明注射后电刺激并未增强BTX-A对步态改善的效果(提供的数据不足以报告效应大小)。其余论文为II级证据(n = 2)、IV级证据(n = 5)和V级证据(n = 14)。我们得出结论,没有足够的证据支持或反驳在CP患儿中BTX-A注射后使用治疗干预措施。