• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男人和女人真的如此不同吗?

Are men and women really so different?

作者信息

Mulder Monique Borgerhoff

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, Graduate Group in Ecology and Center for Population Biology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.002
PMID:16701216
Abstract

Distinct differences in the behaviour and preferences of men and women have conventionally been attributed to Trivers' powerful insights regarding the impact of parental investment on sexual selection and mating systems. This has spawned a huge literature about the evolutionary significance of human sex differences. But are men and women really so different? An elegant new study shows that men and women are strikingly similar in their mate preferences. Have conventional models blinded us to the obvious, and precluded the posing of far more interesting questions?

摘要

传统上,男性和女性在行为和偏好上的明显差异被归因于特里弗斯对亲代投资对性选择和交配系统影响的深刻见解。这催生了大量关于人类性别差异进化意义的文献。但男性和女性真的如此不同吗?一项精妙的新研究表明,男性和女性在配偶偏好上惊人地相似。传统模型是否让我们对显而易见的事实视而不见,并阻碍了提出更有趣的问题呢?

相似文献

1
Are men and women really so different?男人和女人真的如此不同吗?
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Jan;19(1):3-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.11.002.
2
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios.亲代投资、性选择与性别比例。
J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):919-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x. Epub 2008 May 6.
3
Sexual disorders in the context of Darwinian psychiatry.达尔文精神病学背景下的性功能障碍。
J Endocrinol Invest. 2003;26(3 Suppl):54-7.
4
Homosexual mating preferences from an evolutionary perspective: sexual selection theory revisited.从进化角度看同性恋的交配偏好:重探性选择理论
Arch Sex Behav. 2007 Oct;36(5):717-23. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9216-x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
5
Mate attraction, retention and expulsion.伴侣吸引、保留和排斥。
Psicothema. 2010 Feb;22(1):9-14.
6
Mate retention behavior of men and women in heterosexual and homosexual relationships.异性恋和同性恋关系中男性和女性的配偶保留行为。
Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Aug;37(4):572-85. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9139-y.
7
[Sex differences in sexual versus emotional jealousy: evolutionary approach and recent discussions].[性嫉妒与情感嫉妒中的性别差异:进化方法及近期讨论]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Fall;19(3):300-9.
8
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].[完美主义中的失败影响与性别差异]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35.
9
Mate choice and human stature: homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences.择偶偏好与人类身高:同型婚配作为理解婚配偏好的统一框架
Evolution. 2010 Aug;64(8):2189-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00985.x. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
10
Evolutionary pathways in shorebird breeding systems: sexual conflict, parental care, and chick development.滨鸟繁殖系统的进化途径:性冲突、亲代抚育与雏鸟发育
Evolution. 2005 Oct;59(10):2222-30.

引用本文的文献

1
When marital institutions break down: Impact and adaptation among the Enga of Papua New Guinea.当婚姻制度瓦解时:巴布亚新几内亚恩加人的影响与适应
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Mar 1;3:e19. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.13. eCollection 2021.
2
An evolutionary account of status, power, and career in modern societies.现代社会中地位、权力和职业的进化解释。
Hum Nat. 2012 Jun;23(2):191-207. doi: 10.1007/s12110-012-9139-7.
3
Bateman's principles and human sex roles.贝特曼原理与人类性别角色
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jun;24(6):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005. Epub 2009 May 4.