Section of Integrative Biology and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Feb;19(2):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.008.
Optimality models assume that phenotypes evolve by natural selection largely independently of underlying genetic mechanisms. This neglect of genetic mechanisms is considered an advantage by some evolutionary biologists but a fatal flaw by others. The controversy has gone unresolved, in part, from a lack of complex phenotypes that meet optimality criteria and for which the underlying genetic mechanisms are known. Here, we look at both perspectives for lysis time in bacteriophages. We find that the basic assumptions of the optimality model are compatible with the genetic details, but the optimality model is limited in its ability to accommodate lysis time plasticity because the mechanistic underpinnings of plasticity are poorly known.
最优性模型假设表型的进化主要是通过自然选择,而与潜在的遗传机制无关。一些进化生物学家认为这种对遗传机制的忽视是一种优势,但另一些人则认为这是一个致命的缺陷。这种争议之所以没有得到解决,部分原因是缺乏符合最优性标准且其潜在遗传机制已知的复杂表型。在这里,我们从两个角度来看噬菌体的裂解时间。我们发现,最优性模型的基本假设与遗传细节是兼容的,但由于对可塑性的机械基础知之甚少,最优性模型在适应裂解时间可塑性方面的能力有限。