• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弥合差距——微电子材料的生物相容性

Bridging the gap--biocompatibility of microelectronic materials.

作者信息

Bogner E, Dominizi K, Hagl P, Bertagnolli E, Wirth M, Gabor F, Brezna W, Wanzenboeck H D

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, UZA 2, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Acta Biomater. 2006 Mar;2(2):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.10.006
PMID:16701882
Abstract

There is an increasing interest in cell-based microelectronic biosensors for high-throughput screening of new products from the biotech pipeline. This requires fundamental knowledge of the biocompatibility of the materials used as the growing support for the cells. Using monolayer-forming Caco-2 cells of human origin, the biocompatibility of silicon wafers coated with various metals, dielectrics and semiconductors was assessed. Besides microscopic inspection, proliferation of cells indicating viability as well as brush border enzyme activity indicating differentiation of adherent growing cells were chosen as parameters to estimate biocompatibility. The type of wafer used for deposition of the coating initially influences the biocompatibility of the final product. Whereas p-doped silicon was fully biocompatible, n-doped silicon reduced the proliferation of cells. Among the different coatings, Al and Ti even increased the cell growth as compared to glass. Culturing the cells for 6 days on coated wafers demonstrated that the differentiation of adhering cells on Ti- and ZrO2-coated wafers was comparable to glass, whereas coatings with Si3N4, Au, Al, and ITO reduced differentiation to 15-35%. In the cases of Au and Si3N4 this effect equilibrated with prolonged culturing. These results demonstrate the importance of a careful selection of the materials used for the production of cell-based biosensors.

摘要

人们对基于细胞的微电子生物传感器用于高通量筛选生物技术流程中的新产品的兴趣与日俱增。这需要了解用作细胞生长支持物的材料的生物相容性基础知识。使用人源单层形成的Caco-2细胞,评估了涂覆有各种金属、电介质和半导体的硅片的生物相容性。除了显微镜检查外,还选择了指示活力的细胞增殖以及指示贴壁生长细胞分化的刷状缘酶活性作为评估生物相容性的参数。用于沉积涂层的硅片类型最初会影响最终产品的生物相容性。p型掺杂硅具有完全的生物相容性,而n型掺杂硅会降低细胞增殖。在不同的涂层中,与玻璃相比,铝和钛甚至促进了细胞生长。在涂覆的硅片上培养细胞6天表明,在钛和氧化锆涂覆的硅片上贴壁细胞的分化与玻璃相当,而氮化硅、金、铝和氧化铟锡涂层使分化降低至15% - 35%。在金和氮化硅的情况下,如果延长培养时间这种影响会达到平衡。这些结果证明了仔细选择用于生产基于细胞的生物传感器的材料的重要性。

相似文献

1
Bridging the gap--biocompatibility of microelectronic materials.弥合差距——微电子材料的生物相容性
Acta Biomater. 2006 Mar;2(2):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
2
Influence of structured wafer surfaces on the characteristics of Caco-2 cells.结构化晶圆表面对Caco-2细胞特性的影响。
Acta Biomater. 2009 Jan;5(1):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.029. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
3
Biocompatibility studies of functionalized regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) layers for sensing applications.用于传感应用的功能化规整聚(3-己基噻吩)层的生物相容性研究。
Macromol Biosci. 2010 Apr 8;10(4):378-83. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200900412.
4
Selective protein adsorption on micro-textured P-type and N-type silicon wafers.
Biomed Sci Instrum. 2005;41:181-6.
5
In vitro biocompatibility of 45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds coated with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).聚(3-羟基丁酸酯)涂层的45S5生物玻璃衍生微晶玻璃支架的体外生物相容性
J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2009 Feb;3(2):139-48. doi: 10.1002/term.150.
6
Strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite coatings synthesized by pulsed-laser deposition: in vitro osteoblast and osteoclast response.脉冲激光沉积法合成的锶取代羟基磷灰石涂层:体外成骨细胞和破骨细胞反应
Acta Biomater. 2008 Nov;4(6):1885-93. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 May 23.
7
In vitro response of hFOB cells to pamidronate modified sodium silicate coated cellulose scaffolds.人成骨细胞系hFOB对帕米膦酸修饰的硅酸钠包被纤维素支架的体外反应
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2008 Jul 15;64(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
8
Surface engineering of titanium thin films with silk fibroin via layer-by-layer technique and its effects on osteoblast growth behavior.通过层层技术用丝素蛋白对钛薄膜进行表面工程处理及其对成骨细胞生长行为的影响。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Sep 15;82(4):927-35. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31233.
9
Nanocomposite Ti/hydrocarbon plasma polymer films from reactive magnetron sputtering as growth support for osteoblast-like and endothelial cells.通过反应磁控溅射制备的纳米复合钛/碳氢等离子体聚合物薄膜作为成骨样细胞和内皮细胞的生长支持物。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009 Mar 15;88(4):952-66. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31918.
10
In vitro evaluation of textile chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering using human bone marrow stromal cells.使用人骨髓基质细胞对用于组织工程的纺织壳聚糖支架进行体外评估。
Biomacromolecules. 2009 May 11;10(5):1305-10. doi: 10.1021/bm900172m.

引用本文的文献

1
Micro-/Nano-Structured Biodegradable Pressure Sensors for Biomedical Applications.用于生物医学应用的微/纳结构化可生物降解压力传感器。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 1;12(11):952. doi: 10.3390/bios12110952.
2
Prolonged Corrosion Stability of a Microchip Sensor Implant during In Vivo Exposure.微芯片传感器植入体在体内暴露期间的长期腐蚀稳定性。
Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Feb 1;8(1):13. doi: 10.3390/bios8010013.
3
Sensing glucose concentrations at GHz frequencies with a fully embedded Biomicro-electromechanical system (BioMEMS).利用全嵌入式生物微机电系统(BioMEMS)在吉赫兹频率下传感葡萄糖浓度。
J Appl Phys. 2013 Jun 28;113(24):244904. doi: 10.1063/1.4811351. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
4
Commercialisation of CMOS integrated circuit technology in multi-electrode arrays for neuroscience and cell-based biosensors.商业化的 CMOS 集成电路技术在多电极阵列的神经科学和基于细胞的生物传感器。
Sensors (Basel). 2011;11(5):4943-71. doi: 10.3390/s110504943. Epub 2011 May 4.
5
The influence of topographic microstructures on the initial adhesion of L929 fibroblasts studied by single-cell force spectroscopy.单细胞力谱研究地形微观结构对 L929 成纤维细胞初始黏附的影响。
Eur Biophys J. 2011 Mar;40(3):317-27. doi: 10.1007/s00249-010-0649-0. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
6
Two-photon polymerization of microneedles for transdermal drug delivery.双光子聚合微针用于透皮给药。
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010 Apr;7(4):513-33. doi: 10.1517/17425241003628171.