Wissow L S
Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Child Maltreat. 2001 May;6(2):118-29. doi: 10.1177/1077559501006002004.
Nearly half of U.S. parents use physical punishment for child discipline. Although some studies relate physical punishment and later dysfunction, others suggest that its effects depend on the context in which it is used. The authors analyzed data from the Commonwealth Fund Survey of Parents With Young Children, a national sample of 2,017 parents with children younger than 3. Parents reported their use of spanking, five other disciplinary practices, and four nurturing interactions. The authors used cluster analysis to define four groups of parents with distinct patterns of discipline and nurturing. Two groups with above-average use of spanking shared a high prevalence of parent depressive symptoms and a low level of nurturing but had markedly different demographic profiles and use of nonphysical punishment. Parents who used average levels of spanking made frequent use of nonphysical disciplinary strategies and had high levels of nurturing interactions. Parents who reported below-average spanking had relatively low levels of both disciplinary and nurturing interactions.
近半数美国家长采用体罚来管教孩子。尽管一些研究将体罚与日后出现的机能障碍联系起来,但另一些研究表明,其效果取决于使用体罚的具体情境。作者分析了英联邦基金针对有幼儿的家长开展的调查数据,该调查以全国范围内2017名子女未满3岁的家长作为样本。家长们报告了他们使用打屁股的情况、其他五种管教方式以及四种养育互动方式。作者运用聚类分析来界定四类有着不同管教和养育模式的家长群体。两类打屁股频率高于平均水平的家长群体都存在较高比例的家长抑郁症状,且养育程度较低,但他们在人口统计学特征和非体罚的使用方面存在显著差异。使用打屁股频率处于平均水平的家长经常采用非体罚的管教策略,且有着较高程度的养育互动。报告的打屁股频率低于平均水平的家长在管教和养育互动方面的程度都相对较低。