会议海报展示中数字格式、分址格式和传统格式的评估
An evaluation of digital, split-site and traditional formats in conference poster sessions.
作者信息
Bell Catriona, Buckley E Graham, Evans Phillip, Lloyd-Jones Gaynor
机构信息
Medical Teaching Organisation, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
出版信息
Med Teach. 2006 Mar;28(2):175-9. doi: 10.1080/01421590600622806.
The paper reports an evaluation of digital, split-site and traditional poster presentations at the Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE) conference in September 2004. The programme included 300 posters in 19 sessions, viewed, potentially, by 1265 conference participants, in parallel with other events. The instrument was a questionnaire of 16 open- and closed-format questions applied opportunistically and gaining 250 complete responses. Qualitative and quantitative analysis suggested that no one format was preferred. Each had different strengths and weaknesses relating to seeing and hearing the presenter and viewing the poster. Opportunities for discussion were highly valued.
该论文报告了对2004年9月欧洲医学教育协会（AMEE）会议上数字展示、分会场展示和传统海报展示的评估情况。会议议程包括19场展示中的300张海报，与其他活动同期进行，潜在受众为1265名参会者。评估工具是一份包含16个开放式和封闭式问题的调查问卷，随机发放并获得了250份完整回复。定性和定量分析表明，没有一种展示形式更受青睐。每种形式在与展示者交流、观看海报以及听取讲解方面都有不同的优缺点。讨论的机会受到高度重视。
Zotero 插件