Kwon Bom Jun, van den Honert Chris
Cochlear Americas, 400 Inverness Parkway, Suite 400, Englewood, Colorado 80112, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):2994-3002. doi: 10.1121/1.2184128.
Bipolar stimulation has been thought to be more beneficial than monopolar stimulation for speech coding in cochlear implants, on the basis of its more restricted current flow. The present study examined whether bipolar stimulation would indeed lead to reduced channel interaction in a behavioral forward masking experiment tested in four Nucleus 24 users. The masker was fixed on one channel and three masker levels that were balanced for loudness between the configurations were chosen. As expected, masking was maximal when the masker and probe channels were spatially close and decreased as they were separated. However, overall masking patterns did not consistently demonstrate sharper tuning with bipolar stimulation than monopolar. This implies that the spatial extent of a bipolar current field is not consistently narrower than that of an equally loud monopolar stimulus; therefore, it should not be assumed that bipolar stimulation leads to reduced channel interaction. Notably, bipolar masking patterns appeared to display more variations across channels, possibly influenced more by anatomical and neural irregularities near electrode contacts than monopolar masking patterns. The present psychophysical results provide a theoretical basis regarding the widespread use (and success) of monopolar configurations by implant users.
基于其电流分布更受限制,双极刺激被认为在人工耳蜗的言语编码方面比单极刺激更有益。本研究在四名使用Nucleus 24的用户中进行的行为前掩蔽实验中,检验了双极刺激是否确实会减少通道间的相互作用。掩蔽音固定在一个通道上,并选择了三种在不同配置间响度平衡的掩蔽音水平。正如预期的那样,当掩蔽音和探测通道在空间上接近时掩蔽作用最大,且随着它们分开而减小。然而,总体掩蔽模式并未始终如一地表明双极刺激比单极刺激具有更尖锐的调谐。这意味着双极电流场的空间范围并不始终比同样响度的单极刺激的空间范围更窄;因此,不应假定双极刺激会减少通道间的相互作用。值得注意的是,双极掩蔽模式在各通道间似乎表现出更多变化,可能比单极掩蔽模式更多地受到电极触点附近解剖结构和神经不规则性的影响。目前的心理物理学结果为植入用户广泛使用单极配置(并取得成功)提供了理论依据。