ter Kuile Moniek M, Brauer Marieke, Laan Ellen
Department of Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Sexology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Sex Marital Ther. 2006 Jul-Sep;32(4):289-304. doi: 10.1080/00926230600666261.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI; Rosen et al., 2000) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS; Derogatis, Rosen, Leiblum, Burnett, & Heiman, 2002) within a Dutch population of approximately 350 women with and without sexual complaints. The main conclusions of this study are that the multidimensional structure of the FSFI and the unidimensional structure of the FSDS are fairly well replicated in a Dutch sample. The amount of variance explained by confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses was good. Internal consistency and stability of the FSFI and its subscales and the FSDS are satisfactory to good, and the subscales are reasonably stable across demographic variables. The discriminant validity and the ability of the scales to predict the presence or absence of sexual complaints was excellent. The convergent and divergent construct validity of the FSFI and the FSDS was good. These results support the reliability and psychometric validity of the FSFI and the FSDS in the assessment of dimensions of female sexual functioning and sexual distress in clinical and nonclinical samples.
本研究的目的是在一个约有350名有或没有性问题的荷兰女性群体中,调查女性性功能指数(FSFI;Rosen等人,2000年)和女性性困扰量表(FSDS;Derogatis、Rosen、Leiblum、Burnett和Heiman,2002年)的心理测量特性。本研究的主要结论是,FSFI的多维结构和FSDS的单维结构在荷兰样本中得到了相当好的重现。验证性和探索性因素分析所解释的方差量良好。FSFI及其子量表和FSDS的内部一致性和稳定性令人满意到良好,并且子量表在不同人口统计学变量中相当稳定。量表的判别效度以及预测性问题存在与否的能力非常出色。FSFI和FSDS的收敛性和发散性结构效度良好。这些结果支持了FSFI和FSDS在临床和非临床样本中评估女性性功能维度和性困扰方面的可靠性和心理测量效度。