Brand Alma, Waterink Wim, Rosas Scott, van Lankveld Jacques
Faculty of Psychology, Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Limburg, 6419 AT, The Netherlands.
Concept Systems Inc., Ithaca, New York, NY 14850, USA.
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jun 3;3:83. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15833.2. eCollection 2023.
To be able to optimize pelvic healthcare, it would be helpful to specifically assess women's psychological burden with pelvic floor complaints. In the absence of such an instrument, a new instrument was developed to measure this burden in women who seek help. In previous research, a comprehensive overview was yielded of women's restrictions and distress with pelvic floor complaints, and a conceptual model was developed of seven types of distress that were reflected by 33 statements. The present study was performed to investigate the psychometric properties of the new instrument, termed the Pelvic Floor Complaint-related Psychological Burden Inventory (PFC-PBI).
In an online survey data was collected from women with and without pelvic floor complaints on the 33 statements. The internal consistency of the types of distress was tested using item-total correlation analysis, Principal Component and Confirmatory Factor Analyses were performed, and the convergent and divergent validity of the types of distress was examined against existing questionnaires using the Multi-Trait Multi-Method methodology.
Based on the factor analyses, a 10-item instrument was tested. Outcomes show excellent internal consistency of this instrument, comprising a single component. The PFC-PBI demonstrated satisfactory convergent and divergent validity.
This new measure appears to be a promising tool to inventory the psychological burden of women suffering from pelvic floor complaints. Research into its further development, implementation, and clinical use appears warranted.
为了能够优化盆腔健康护理,专门评估女性因盆底问题产生的心理负担会有所帮助。由于缺乏这样一种工具,因此开发了一种新工具来测量寻求帮助的女性的这种负担。在先前的研究中,对女性因盆底问题所受的限制和困扰进行了全面概述,并建立了一个概念模型,该模型包含由33条陈述反映的七种困扰类型。本研究旨在调查一种名为盆底问题相关心理负担量表(PFC-PBI)的新工具的心理测量特性。
在一项在线调查中,收集了有和没有盆底问题的女性对这33条陈述的数据。使用项目-总分相关分析测试困扰类型的内部一致性,进行主成分分析和验证性因素分析,并使用多特质多方法方法对照现有问卷检验困扰类型的收敛效度和区分效度。
基于因素分析,对一个包含10个条目的工具进行了测试。结果表明该工具具有出色的内部一致性,由单个成分组成。PFC-PBI显示出令人满意的收敛效度和区分效度。
这项新测量方法似乎是一种很有前景的工具,可用于评估患有盆底问题的女性的心理负担。对其进一步开发、实施和临床应用的研究似乎很有必要。